Intel Open Sources New 'One Mono' Font for Programmers (github.com) 51
Intel has announced Intel One Mono, a new font catering to "the needs of developers" with an "expressive" monospace for clarity and legibility"
It's easier to read, and available for free, with an open-source font license.
Identifying the typographically underserved low-vision developer audience, Frere-Jones Type designed the Intel One Mono typeface in partnership with the Intel Brand Team and VMLY&R, for maximum legibility to address developers' fatigue and eyestrain and reduce coding errors. A panel of low-vision and legally blind developers provided feedback at each stage of design.
The Linux blog OMG! Ubuntu calls the new font "pretty decent," adding that "Between IBM Plex Mono, Hack, Fira Code, and JetBrains Mono I think we Linux users are spoilt for choice when it comes to open-source monospace fonts that look good and work great.
"Still, there's always room for more, right...?" Better yet, it's not only free to download and use but free to edit, and free to redistribute... Overall, I think Intel One Mono looks great, especially in a text editor (GUI or CLI). There's a noticeable upper and lower margin to the font that in dense text situations allows text to breathe, but in some terminal tools, like Neofetch, the gaps can seem a bit too happy.
The Intel One Mono repository on GitHub includes instructions for activating the font in VSCode and Sublime Text, and lists some extra features accessible in some applications and via CSS:
Identifying the typographically underserved low-vision developer audience, Frere-Jones Type designed the Intel One Mono typeface in partnership with the Intel Brand Team and VMLY&R, for maximum legibility to address developers' fatigue and eyestrain and reduce coding errors. A panel of low-vision and legally blind developers provided feedback at each stage of design.
The Linux blog OMG! Ubuntu calls the new font "pretty decent," adding that "Between IBM Plex Mono, Hack, Fira Code, and JetBrains Mono I think we Linux users are spoilt for choice when it comes to open-source monospace fonts that look good and work great.
"Still, there's always room for more, right...?" Better yet, it's not only free to download and use but free to edit, and free to redistribute... Overall, I think Intel One Mono looks great, especially in a text editor (GUI or CLI). There's a noticeable upper and lower margin to the font that in dense text situations allows text to breathe, but in some terminal tools, like Neofetch, the gaps can seem a bit too happy.
The Intel One Mono repository on GitHub includes instructions for activating the font in VSCode and Sublime Text, and lists some extra features accessible in some applications and via CSS:
- There is an option for a raised colon, either applied contextually between numbers or activated generally.
- Superior/superscript and inferior/subscript figures are included via their Unicode codepoints, or you can produce them from the default figures via the sups (Superscript), subs (Subscript), and si (Scientific Inferior) features.
- Fraction numerals are similarly available via the numr (Numerator) and dnom (Denominator) features. A set of premade fractions is also available in the fonts.
Re: [PTHC] Intel's feeble attempt (Score:2)
Wut?
Re: (Score:2)
well, they open sourced it, maybe somebody will fork it to create a distribution ensuring near neck-beardiest of nerds that both like the font and also don't like to see the word Intel on their screen are happy... unfortunately I'm certain they will still have to give credit to Intel in some way though...
Let's Have a Look (Score:5, Interesting)
Sample looks promising (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Looking at the sample code in TFA, it doesn't look great to me.
I'm not expert but I think the lines are not high enough. They look compressed and that makes the outlines of the characters and the words less clear.
I think some of the characters are a bit wide too. The think characters like i and l are better being narrow, even with monospace it helps differentiate them. It looks less visually pleasing, but for coding I want readability.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
its almost like font choice is a subjective, aesthetic and personal choice
Re: (Score:2)
its almost like font choice is a subjective, aesthetic and personal choice
For coding/terminals, not really. Either you can clearly read a font or not.
Yeah, that is where the subjective comes in - I might be able to clearly read it and you not. Agreed the {} are overdone, and others point out it looks compressed but whatever, for me it does beat monotype and droid sans mono for clarity.
Re: Sample looks promising (Score:2)
This gives me a weird idea.
Many programmers have moved away from QWERTY. Now of course QWERTY is also pretty arbitraryâ"as is the mapping between glyph and sound or letter. Yet obviously to the world non-qwerty solutions seem weird.
Would it make sense to develop a font that is optimized for programming (and/or a specific vision deficiency) and that has nothing to do with how the glyphs normally look like, but is instead optimized to be as unambigous as possible in the context used? I.e. forget that 't'
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, you can clearly distinguish ILl1| as well as oO0 - something many mono fonts get wrong. The quotes are a little off however: it's hard to tell without comparison which is the back quote. And the double quotes are slanted for some reason, which looks wrong when used at both ends of a quotation.
Honestly, you'd think designing a readable font was hard or something...
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty good. (Score:5, Interesting)
I was using "Source Code Pro" which is an excellent font but I see advantages to "One Mono". From the start, you can see that the curly braces are much easier to distinguish from parenthesis though they do look a bit odd at first glance. I also noticed the exclamation is distinctive and the comma is easier to recognize.
I'm gonna use it.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm gonna use it.
I'd like to second that. I've switched Terminal and Code to it, and my aging eyes are appreciating its legibility at small point sizes.
It wasn't always this way (Score:4, Interesting)
Linux users are spoilt for choice when it comes to open-source monospace fonts that look good and work great.
Back in the day, one of the first things I always had to do after installing a new Linux instance was install a copy of "LUTRS14.FON" that I had appropriated from Windows.
I guess that the date that the TrueType patent expired should be remembered as a banner day in history.
Too rounded for my liking. I'm stuck on Fixedsys. (Score:3)
I'm still using Fixedsys all these years later. As a bitmap font it is crisper and clearer, and being a little chunky helps make it clearer IMO.
Re: (Score:2)
I use Fixedsys as well, it is very readable to me, works both black on white and white on black and the characters are all different. It also looks good.
Re: (Score:2)
Finally had to give up Fixedsys, as Windows refuses to scale it on a high-DPI display. It's insane that nobody has created a genuine TTF equivalent. I've tried dozens, they are all different in subtle (and usually stupid) ways.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Fixedsys is a good choice too.
I've been fine with Consolas (Score:2)
But I'll try this one out for a while, see if I like it. It always feels a bit "off" when I first switch to a different font...
The old VGA font works the best for my eyes (Score:4, Interesting)
I've tried a lot of different fonts for terminal and programming work but I keep coming back to a truetype version of a font many of us old guys know and love. The IBM VGA BIOS font that was the standard for text mode MS-DOS for decades. At 2k and 4k resolutions the font would have to be scaled (and it's not designed to be a vector scalable font) but that's okay. At 1900x1200 it looks great on my screen. Small but very readable. I like the heavier look.
https://laemeur.sdf.org/fonts/ [sdf.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Another similar font that's more scalable is https://www.dafont.com/nouveau... [dafont.com] . But not sure how it looks on a high dpi screen at readable point sizes.
Re:The old VGA font works the best for my eyes (Score:4, Informative)
I use the VGA font as well - I've added it to every editor I have as it helps make perfect distinction between 0(zero) and O (capital o) as well as several other characters. I use a TrueType version so it can be scaled and even has extended Unicode characters because of the world we live in. Plus, they are nice a "fat" so no big monospace fonts with thin lines making it hard to read.
The only problem is the site has a million different fonts because on PCs, the fonts were stored in a character ROM and thus all were all so slightly different. But The IBM 9x16 VGA font (Unicode is +Plus edition) is installed on all the machines I have.
https://int10h.org/oldschool-p... [int10h.org]
Scaled up it loses its "blockiness" but still reminds you of the font.
Re: (Score:2)
Awesome! Thanks for the link! I'll give it a download.
Re: (Score:1)
alternatives (Score:3)
Reminds me of IBM's OCR font (Score:2)
And yeah, I'm an oldfart.
Re: (Score:2)
I've seen worse (Score:2)
But it is no Liberation sans v.1, but then no font is. The closest still in maintained is Cousine
9x15 (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I used the classic 6x13 (aka "fixed", the font compiled into the X server as the default/fall-back) for a really long time (just over 30 years). I like the narrower look, I can see more without moving my eyes I guess. I classified displays by how many 80-column xterms with 6x13 I could get side-by-side on the screen. :)
However, higher DPI monitors obsoleted it (and all bitmap fonts really). I doubled it to 12x26 for one display, but a newer and even higher-DPI monitor just left it behind (I tried various ot
Re: (Score:2)
-*-clean-medium-r-normal--14-*-*-*-*-*-*-* is my first and true love
Too much line spacing (Score:2)
Too wide (Score:1)
Looks ok .. (Score:2)
The ampersand indeed looks a bit odd as someone mentioned. I guess they aim to distinguish it stronger from an 8?
The only change *I* would make is remove the foot on which the 1 is standing. What is a point in distinguishing capital I from lowercase eL if the 1 just looks *nearly* the same as a capital I?
On the other hand, years ago I started to basically remove all syntax highlighting, at least most of the colours and only activate italic, bold and underline.
There is no real point for me that every line of
Sorry, looks amateurish and uneven. (Score:1)
Inconsolata Medium (Score:2)
I spent a long time searching for a decent terminal font and finally settled on Inconsolata Medium [google.com], which I find very easy on my eyes.
Old school (Score:2)
Nice monospace font with nice looking serifs.
FUCK the boring sans serifs fonts.
Re: Old school (Score:2)
Feels as outdated as C++ imo.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Old school (Score:2)
Dude a dingo is eating your baby
Re: (Score:2)
Am I the only one (Score:2)
... who uses Comic Sans in the terminal?
Source and Plex (Score:2)
My two favorite fonts for code are Source Code Pro from the Source family, and Plex Mono from the IBM Plex family.
https://www.ibm.com/plex/
https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Source+Code+Pro
I love FiraCode (Score:2)