O'Reilly Now Competing With Sun Java Certificates

Joel Aufgang writes "O'Reilly Media's O'Reilly School of Technology in partnership with the University of Illinois has just launched a Java Programming Certificate Series, which looks like it's intended to compete with the Sun Certified Java Programmer (SCJP) certification. According to O'Reilly's press release, this is not an exam-based certification but rather a series of project based instructor-led courses that, if you pass, earns certification backed by the University of Illinois. Also interesting is the use of Eclipse as the preferred learning platform as opposed to Netbeans."

I don't know...

[i kan reed (749298)]

"I took a class." can be even more easily abused than, "I passed a test." for posing false technical capability. Maybe not though. The market is definitely flooded with people using certifications to mean "ability." I hope this mitigates the problem rather than continuing it.

Have you taken a SCJP exam?

[MikeRT (947531)]

I took one earlier this year. It was primarily good for testing my ability to regurgitate information about the language and APIs. That's it.

If I were an employer, I would give much more credence to someone coming in as an entry level hire or switching from another language if they had something like this. Lab-based, graded courses show that you have at least some practical ability to apply the material.

In hindsight, I agree with a professor of mine who said that a single, solid A in a 400-level CS class is probably worth more than any programming certification starting out. If you want to do this on the cheap, just take a few classes at a community college. That's what I'm doing to get some "official training" to back up the fact that I do know C# well enough to make the switch from Java. One or two audited courses will have the same effect, but cost me less than $300 and I'll only have to do a few homework assignments and exams :)

Re:

[pinkstuff (758732)]

I believe that is the idea - SCJP is about memorising the facts, and the SCJD [sun.com] is about testing the application of that knowledge. I know that when I sat the SCJP I did pickup some things that I never new even with my industry experience, so IMHO it is worth while.

Re:

[tmdawg1975 (1406841)]

Agreed -- exam-based certifications are good filler on a resume, but experience is king. I can tell you though, the OST courses focus on real-world experience, not an exam. There's an instructor that coaches you and keeps you at it until you get it right.

System Administration vs. Programming Certs

[qbzzt (11136)]

It might be different on the networking side, but I've never seen a developer cert that was worth the paper it was printed on.

Programming certs are silly because programmers are usually hired by other programmers who use the same systems. Serious programs are rarely written by a single person. The manager of a Java programming team usually knows Java.

System administration certs make more sense because the hiring manager may not be familiar with the specific product, and so would be unable to verify the comp

Re:

[afidel (530433)]

Why would you throw away a resume just because they list their certs? I can see discounting or even skipping over the section, but throwing out a candidate because they gave you information seems to be a sure way to lose good people. I admit I'm on the networking side, but I tend to put enough information on my resume to show a wide variety of experience. I could show just the stuff listed in their job posting but then I'd probably get pigeonholed into some narrow focused job, I'm a generalist and would lik

Re:

[lemnik (835774)]

We recently had a discussion about this on our local JUG, and the consensus was in fact that people giving to much weight to their "eduction" would generally have their CV's chucked. People doing the hiring view certificates (especially to many of them) as a way to cover up incompetence.

Re:

[DuckDodgers (541817)]

I work at a company that uses Struts and Hibernate. Many of the places hiring senior Java devs near me want the candidate to be proficient in Spring. In my personal experience, simply writing a technology down on a resume without having any attached work experience does not carry any weight.

So what would you suggest? Writing an application with Spring and referencing the URL on the resume? Simply listing that I am proficient with it despite the lack of work experience? Or a Spring certification?

Re:

[Vellmont (569020)]

So what would you suggest? Writing an application with Spring and referencing the URL on the resume? Simply listing that I am proficient with it despite the lack of work experience? Or a Spring certification?

I take it you're not proficient in Spring?

If that's the case, don't pretend to be. If you're smart, frameworks are very easy to pickup if you're in an environment where they're already used. If a place is really adamant about "requiring framework or technology X", then it's a good sign there's somethi

Re:

[DuckDodgers (541817)]

I wouldn't lie. I would only list a Spring website or personal proficiency after I had actually built one or developed it, respectively.

But hoping that all HR screening processes are reasonable is rough. I've got three kids, if one job goes south for any reason I want to find a local replacement very fast.

Re:

[DuckDodgers (541817)]

I took the SCJP cert after I had three years of Java work experience because I thought studying for it might fill in some gaps in my knowledge of Java. Turns out I was right.

• I had been implementing hashcode incorrectly in some of my classes, and only dumb luck prevented me from unplanned duplicate entries in my HashMap and HashSet objects.
• I had occasionally been using Lists when I should have used Sorted Sets.
• I got comfortable with the syntax for static inner classes and anonymous inner classes.
• I now

Re:

[AmaDaden (794446)]

Agreed. I am a recent 4 year college grad. I have not yet taken the exam but I've been reading the Java core books. There is so much I was never taught about how Java works at collage. You might be able to write a good program in Java but if you can't pass that test you will never be able to write truly great programs that take full advantage of what Java has to offer.

To add to your list... I spent a good week looking for a good description of Java annotations on the web. In the end I just looked it up in

Re:

[gbjbaanb (229885)]

yeah, if you're complaining about the performance and resource usage of your favourite IDE, you need to run Visual Studio 2008. oh wait a minute....

Re:

[DragonWriter (970822)]

They take too long to start and whenever I move my cursor, they both hang - and this is with a 1.6 GHz Duo, a gig of Ram, on XP.

I suspect you're doing it wrong. I've got a similar setup on my laptop, and Netbeans is usually not too slow, and Eclipse is tolerable most of the time. Even on my older desktop -- a 3.0 Pentium IV HT with 512MB and XP -- Netbeans is mostly tolerable, though Eclipse is a bit of a drag.

Re:

[AmaDaden (794446)]

It depends on how many projects you have and what else you are running. I do JSP work on a huge code base. So I tend to have a web server, Eclipse, and web browser running at all times. I needed at least 2 gigs to work at any kind of normal speed.

I would like to note that the version of Java you are running DOES matter. Java has significant speed and GUI improvements every release. If you can't update the version of Java for the software you're running Eclipse can compile and run software with one JDK and

Re:Pigs

[gatesvp (957062)]

A good IDE is a productivity tool. It leverages computer power to make your job faster, via things like "Intellisense", drag & drop code, easy refactoring tools, visual tools, etc. It's unfortunate that these IDEs don't come with a "Power Slider" to let you control things like what get cached and what doesn't.

However, in your case, XP really sucks on one gig of RAM. I've seen VS 2005 take an entire gig just for large project. Remember, the IDE isn't trying to be a pig here, it's trying to cache all kinds of things in memory to make your job easier and faster. But your laptop is definitely a few years behind the curve. You're basically asking why your Power Drill isn't working very well with your AAA batteries.

Re:

[tepples (727027)]

But your laptop is definitely a few years behind the curve. You're basically asking why your Power Drill isn't working very well with your AAA batteries.

But if I'm trying to get a job, how do I pay for newer hardware to develop a portfolio on?

Re:

[setagllib (753300)]

You may just have too much RAM already used by the time you start Eclipse. I generally run Eclipse J2EE + more plugins in about 128-256MB heap space, and as long as that heap space is available on *physical* memory, it's silky smooth even on a 1.2Ghz Duo. You are doing something wrong and it's not Eclipse' fault.

Re:

[svank (1301529)]

...and this is with a 1.6 GHz Duo, a gig of Ram, on XP. Geeze, WTF! Do I need a frick'n gaming machine to write code now?!?

Notepad should run just fine on that kind of setup. Code away!

Good, the Java Certificate is useless

[bug_hunter (32923)]

Java Certification only proves you know how to answer trick questions. It's primarily just shows lines with several operators in it and you have to know which ones take priority.
The correct answer to most of the questions should be "This code is so horrible I would rewrite it to be clearer".

When hiring, I've found Java Certified people to be worse than the norm, in no way does it actually test your ability to program.

Re:

[sixtwentytwo94 (1406833)]

I work for O'Reilly and I can definitely say we didn't design this program to compete with some test. It's was designed to compete with Universities.

Re:

[DuckDodgers (541817)]

This code is so horrible I would rewrite it to be clearer.

Which is great until you need to read someone else's existing code and figure out what it does. Try explaining to the boss why you spent a week rewriting code that already passed QA because you couldn't understand operator precedence.

Besides, some of the Sun Java certification is silly stuff like that but a lot is standard APIs, appropriate classes (e.g. given a specific scenario, which java Collection is most appropriate?), serialization, etc.

Eclipse

[Garg (35772)]

Also interesting is the use of Eclipse as the preferred learning platform as opposed to Netbeans.

Wow, so they teach what people actually use? What a concept!

Kidding (sort of)... NetBeans may be wonderful. But I don't think I've talked to anyone that's used it on a regular basis since 2002, It's about 90% Eclipse and 9.9% IDEA, with the occasional hard-core VI guy.

Re:Eclipse

[Electrawn (321224)]

What happened to jBuilder?

I use Netbeans at work extensively since about 5.5. Dependent projects, auto compiling java code from WSDL web services, debug to tomcat in one click. PHP integration now in 6.5. Rarely do I actually have to screw with the conf files as I had to do with eclipse. Worth a second look.

Re:

[setagllib (753300)]

All of those features, and many more, are available in Eclipse directly or through extensions. Take another look. Well, unless you're so happy you don't see any possibility of switching back anyway.

Re:

[setagllib (753300)]

I have no idea what you're talking about. I have never had trouble installing plugins. I run more languages and features through Eclipse than NetBeans has in all of its core and plugins combined, simply because the community is so much larger and more effective.

Whatever theoretical advantage NetBeans has because of its single-source packaging is completely irrelevant if it just doesn't support features you need, or an entire popular language like Python (only through plugins, so it's back on equal footing w

Re:

[jlarocco (851450)]

When I have to do Java work, I use Emacs. I tried really hard to use Eclipse at my last job, because that's what everybody else used. But after two months I broke down and installed Emacs.

I found Eclipse to be slow, bloated (even compared to Emacs!), difficult to use, difficult to configure, difficult to customize, and difficult to add new functionality.

Come on man

[LordKaT (619540)]

That loud mouthed good for nothing son of a ...

Oh. Nevermind, carry on.

Re:

[EmperorKagato (689705)]

Go Go...

I'm working on this now

[cptBongo (1376805)]

Got a pretty boring job right now, so I thought I'd tried to bump up my skills during regular office downtime. The Unix sysadmin modules are OK, and a million miles better than crappy 'learn-by-rote' microsoft courses. To get through them you do need to have some clue, though I have found them pretty easy (with 2 years' sysadmin experience). I would recommend them to a total beginner to get up to speed working on real systems. Anyone at a higher level can get just as much from a test system and a bunch of

Don't Do it!!!!

[BradleyAndersen (1195415)]

I have a "Web Programming" cert from O'Reilly. One of the six (> $300 @) courses comprising said cert required me to "learn" Unix. I think we got as far as the 'ls' command. The O'Reilly folks are where I turn first for IT books, but, these courses simply do not measure up.