Slashdot Log In
State Of The Simputer
Posted by
timothy
on Wed Sep 17, 2003 07:59 AM
from the intention-attrition dept.
from the intention-attrition dept.
2br02b writes "Readers might recall the Simputer (Simple, Inexpensive, Multilingual Computer) whose story Slashdot has been following over the past few years, including its release in October 2002 and most recently the Scientific American article in November. Rediff.com has an informative overview on the status of what was introduced as a low-cost computer for the poor to be sold for under Rs 10000 ($200). Of the two companies that have been given licences, one has yet to put the product on the market while the other is only looking at bulk sales at prices from Rs 12000 to Rs 20000 ($400). Only between 1500 and 2000 Simputers are out on the market."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Computer for the poor? (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://www.sandpile.org/)
I'm not at all against technology education and maximizing its use wherever possible, but there truly are some things that must take priority here.
Re:argueable, but... (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.inter-sections.net/)
Knowledge is power, as they say...
Daniel
The 35 cent solution. (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Tuesday August 28, @07:41PM)
So what's wrong with a photocopied pamphlet or even a book? Hundreds, perhaps thousands of booklets could be printed for the cost of one of these computers.
If the goal is the distribution of information, this is the wrong tool for the job.
Re:argueable, but... (Score:5, Insightful)
For example: If you give poor farmers in Africa, India, ... computers, they could use them to improve there farming and harvest more food or to make a better profit selling their harvest.
3rd world farmers suffer more from trade barriers, dumping by the US and Europe, beauracracy and wars than a lack of efficiency
Re:argueable, but... (Score:4, Insightful)
You forgot the word "subsidised".
Re:Computer for the poor? (Score:5, Insightful)
This is a device that is meant to help close the digital divide. You take for granted how much information is at your fingertips and what advantages there are to having that information. If you are looking for a job where are you going to start? Probably on Monster or HotJobs or some other site. Send out some resumes by email that you typed in your word processor. Now take away your computer and try to do the old fashioned way. Type your resume on a typewriter, pay to have it photocopied, flip through a newspaper and walk door to door only to have them reject you because you don't have computer experience.
Not everything is about helping the poorest of the poor. There are a lot more people out there who need some help too.
computer for the poor? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: computer for the poor? (Score:5, Insightful)
How about to educate themselves and get out of the slum. I came from a poor rural area not realy a slum. My parents overextended their budget buing a C64 for us when I was in junior high. Many people saw that as a waste of money. My parents saw that as an investment. It paid off. I'm a programmer now.
Re: computer for the poor? (Score:5, Insightful)
What a clueless moron you are. That may well be true in the affluent west where if you work hard
you can better yourself but in some countries the children don't get a chance to be educated before they're out in the fields helping their parents
grow food or even supporting their brothers and sisters after their parents have died from disease or war!
"They just want the government to hand them welfare and be done with it. "
Yeah , the welfare systems in africa and india are known to be the best in the world right!
Jesus , get a clue you insular dick!
Comparitive Soscio-Economics (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://holoradix.blogspot.com/)
I'm not sure how it works in India, but it is probably (please correct me if I'm wrong) similar to the Philippines where the average college graduate makes about $300 / month.
If you assume that the average college graduate in the US makes $3k - $4k / month, then a fair comparison would be a $3500 computer in the U.S. to a $300 computer in the Philippines (or perhaps, India). From an expense point of view, it is likely to be affordable (although certainly a luxury).
But to imagine that these people do not wish to communicate, learn and reach out to the world through the Internet is fairly ignorant. In my experience with families from the third world, a computer (and even a broadband connection, which can be had for pennies on our dollars) is more desirable than a telephone or television.
My conclusion? The simputer may not fit the bill, but the need and economics are right on.
Re: computer for the poor? (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.jeffreyhamby.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday August 02 2005, @01:54PM)
Let's not discount the fact that the per capita GDP in India is $2,540, which would make a $200 PC in India worth $2960.63 in US dollars (US per capita GDP = $37,600).
Some help that is...
Re: computer for the poor? (Score:4, Insightful)
i would say its pretty clear that many gen-X-ers got quite a bit of a technological leg-up from their boomer parents overextending their salary similarly.
the sale of cheap computing to underdeveloped countries is a Good Thing (tm).
sure, they need improvements in other basic areas too - but not everyone who wants to help can work on the same project (too many cooks), and some people just don't have expertise or experience in providing and distributing clean water, replenishing spent soil, or extending the electrical infrastructure.
does it make it a less noble goal to bring computing prices down? to provide an educational and informational medium to these people?
indians in particular living in the world's oldest democracy, would certainly tangibly benefit from being more educated voters.
the broader online marketplace also provides tangible benefits, even for the underprivileged (who benefit more from better prices/competition).
if anything, that money makes more sense for them now than it did when the boomers bought into it for X-ers. The internet adds exponentially to the value of a home computer.
not all of their children will grow up to be programmers or engineers, but there are tangible benefits to be had. yes, it requires some proactivity, and yes - not everyone in india (or any other underdeveloped nation) needs/would actually benefit from a PC.
but if only a dozen, or a hundred take the opportunity and turn it to their will - that'd make it a worthwhile cause.
how do they expect it to sell? (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://timgray.blogspot.com/)
Another great idea tanked by a bunch of PHB's
I'm going to go into direct competition (Score:2, Funny)
(Last Journal: Friday June 11 2004, @11:15AM)
just donate your old ones (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://chrismage.cjb.net/ | Last Journal: Monday September 29 2003, @07:58PM)
Aren't we all poor to some extent? (Score:1, Insightful)
(http://www.devinmoore.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday May 24 2007, @06:16AM)
What a shame (Score:3, Insightful)
Utopian ideals... (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.cookstour.org/ | Last Journal: Saturday August 18 2001, @06:40AM)
If they produce something with low capabilities, but a low, low price, then they will be accused of producing underpowered rubbish.
As soon as you start to increase the potential of the platform, the costs start to rise until you have an elitist product that the intended market cannot afford.
There *may* be a happy medium somewhere, but the edvil is in the details of finding it. In the consumerist marketplace we have in the West, production prices are already pushed as low as possible. Squeezing out extra pennies in production is almost impossible. The potential is there though to reduce prices through the marketing and adminitration side of things (pay no fat-cat salaries to the sales & management departments), but then again the product quickly becomes unfashionable and therefore undesirable.
I would love to see such a product to succeed, but it's a hell of an uphill stuggle!
Those well-paid Indians (Score:4, Interesting)
What it all comes down to is (Score:4, Interesting)
"Well, it's not a cheap computer.
Its proponents have since discarded the buzzword -- 'cheap computer' -- that brought the Simputer into the limelight.
"We are not making a cheap computer. We are making a sophisticated device that will make computing possible for everyone," declares Professor Manohar."
What a crock of bull. How is computing possible for "everyone" when "most" Indians can't afford to spend $400 on a PDA?
Um... (Score:2, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Monday October 11 2004, @09:43PM)
>people were interchanging polarities while inserting batteries and battery contacts were coming loose due to rough handling.
The UI interface better be really really simple.
And yes I think this is a dumb idea. Just give them old desktop computers. There is no reason for portability to be simple, inexpensive or multilingual.
Why a special product? (Score:1)
I also am aware that any computer for 3rd world must have batteries and solar capability, AND be dirt/water resistant. But with lower prices for smaller (12in.) flat screens and integration, why is it so hard? As an afterthought, ever wondered what these computers would use for printers? Do they come with a roll of 5-inch "cash register" paper and a few spares for an internal printer?
Needs a few changes (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Saturday May 01 2004, @04:37AM)
2. Cheap and robust external power supply. Batteries are expensive.
2. B&W screen, for godsake. Color is luxury, make a high-contrast large, protected B&W screen that can show decent amounts of information.
3. Little chiclet keyboard that plugs in to a mini-USB slot. Something like the old Spectrum keyboards, cheap, nasty, unbreakable.
That would make it cheaper and more useful. Imagine a computer you'd happily give to an 10-year old, no matter if it breaks.
Lastly, I'd add bluetooth because it's a tiny extra cost, only a few $, and provides unbreakable networking and connectivity better than any physical connection, and make the whole thing run on a stripped-down embedded Linux.
$400 is much too expensive (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://ninenine.com/)
Intention and Commercialism (Score:2, Insightful)
(http://www.exmosis.net/)
I seem to remember, when the Simputer first hit the backpages of IT newspaper supplements, that the point of the simputer was to provide a set of designs that could be produced cheaply, the idea being that this production would then be available to anyone with the right resources/motivation, rather than just those who wanted to sell it for profit to geeky businessmen. When I signed onto the Simputer mailing list, there was a lot of talk about this, and the method in which a charge would only be entailed for mass-producers - everybody else, wanting to produce less than a certain number of units, was free to take the designs (and the software, IIRC) and use them.
Casting an eye over the Simputer site [simputer.org] reveals an interesting addition - the SGPL [simputer.org], or Simputer General Public License. There are then TWO separate licenses (the SDML [simputer.org] and the, uh, SDML [simputer.org] to manufacture it. Alas, I have no time at the moment to work out precisely what the differences are, though judging by the title ("Simputer" versus "Simputerised"), this is something to do with which components you intend to use.
Nevertheless, it would seem that the original intention to roll out a technology for the common good has slipped a little, though the reasons for this I can only speculate on, and would be wrong to do so... Alas, I think that the most practical way to achieve the original goals, to promote the use of communication technologies (as this is the essential bit) in the same way that radio technology spread, is to make it truly owned by nobody, veritably public domain. To achieve it alongside commercial interests means something usually has to give on one side or the other.
On a different note, perhaps the EU could gleam some advice on patents from the SGPL too...
The High Cost of Software (Score:3, Funny)
(http://atari.org/)
Perhaps moving development offshore isn't the cost saver it's been promoted as.
:)
What is so special about that? (Score:2)
(http://future.wikicities.com/)
obsolete before released (Score:2)
Simputer became expensive because.. (Score:3)
(http://www.mritunjai.com/)
Simputer "became" expensive because... (Score:2)
(http://www.mritunjai.com/)
"Our Simputer comes with a smart card reader. It has a USB master that can host different kind of peripherals. It has an in-built modem, GSM/CDMA data interface, GPS receiver and the equivalent of a 400 MHZ Celeron [comment: its a SA proc]. It is a power packed machine," says Samyeer Metrani, group manager (embedded systems), Encore Technologies.
Probably they needed to include the goodies for special purposes, but somehow they got in the "basic" model where many of these weren't even needed. Comeon... even Palm and Zaurus don't have GPS receiver and CDMA+GSM interface, buildin modem and a 400(!) MHz processor.
The cost can surely be brought down, but then they would be competing with established players. So they chose the alternative route to play in niche markets with feature packed versions... and its very well known that benefits of economies of scale are usually not available to niche players!
Cheaper than the Simputer (Score:3, Informative)
(http://lxer.com/module/forums/t/23168/ | Last Journal: Monday January 23 2006, @06:32PM)
The Simputer is a neat idea
but who is going to buy them
if you can already get something cheaper/faster
with more storage?
Here is a 1.2 Duron with a 20 gig drive for $200 US.
[walmart.com]
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?produc
Of course if you have no place to plug it in
then you're hosed.
Deceptive Marketing (Score:2)
Tired of Patronizing Attitude of Slasdotters (Score:1, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Sunday July 20 2003, @07:35PM)
more tech details about the simputer (Score:5, Informative)
(http://pamri.blogspot.com/)
I think we're missing the point.... (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.bitbuckett.net/)
This product makes sense in India. (Score:2, Insightful)
But obviously who ever was posting it didnt have even the vaguest idea about India or for that matter any third world over populated nation.
Firstly, this is not for personal ownership. I dont think that marketing people in India expect to sell $400 product to Bhole Ram (equivalent of Joe Consumer) who earns $500 annually. This product would be for collective use - like those internet cafes- most people in developed countries use internet cafes(if at all) because they cannot lug their pc/laptop around. But its a different story in developing countries - people use them because they cant afford to buy a pc and have regular internet connection. So it makes perfect sense for a village governing body to buy one of these and provide some kind of access scheme to the villagers to use it. Why a simputer? why not a pc? firstly cost.. secondly size... last but not the least usability and maintanance.
Cellphone networks are easier to get access to than regular phone lines in india and it makes perfect sense to make provision for wireless internet access in the simputer.
Now I want to address the "why computers to the hungry?" part. Its about information dissemenation.
1. Natural disasters - floods, cyclones, forest fires.. earth quakes.
2. accidents...
3. pestilences and animal diseases.
4. Information about governance
Time and again the above have proved to be major problems in India and they took large toll because of the lack of information. In a 1977 storm surge 20k people died in coastal Andhra villages and the reason is that they never knew about the impending cyclone.
plant and animal pestilences usually sweep across the nation.. nothing much can be done about it if people are not informed in advance.
proper medical care never reaches accident victims in villages because the nearest phone is 20 miles away and the nearest doctor is 50 miles away.
Redtape is a way of life in India. If you dont know the rules of the red tape, you are so screwed. poor uninformed villagers are the ones who usually fall prey to these practises.
Now - coming to the hungry and starving part of things, people in one part of the country can die of starvation without any help reaching them - only due to the lack of information.
yes - there are millions of people under the poverty line in India. many of them can get only 1 meal a day with difficulty.. the only way to empower these people is by providing them access to information and letting them decide what they want to with their own lives.
now all you booers and nay sayers can take ur crock and shove it... u know where.
they got no food.. why give them clothes? they got no clothes.. why give them houses? they got no houses.. why freedom of speech?... you all are mary antoinettes...
Why? (Score:2)
cheap linux pc (Score:3, Interesting)
The tv becomes their gateway to the rest of the world-- a one way feed.
if you really want, you should build a computer that costs 150$ linux machine and uses the tv as a monitor-- i think that would be a more ideal solution. Basically, if walmart can make linux machines and sell them at $200, it shouldn't be that much harder to bring the price down by 50.
in cost in rupees, that would be 7500/- cheaper than the simputer.
Pictures (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.kajmereso...io/journey_in_BB.ram | Last Journal: Tuesday May 18 2004, @10:41PM)
More recent picture [jetro.go.jp]
Picture 1 [jetro.go.jp]
Picture 2 [jetro.go.jp]
Picture 3 [jetro.go.jp]
Picture 4 [jetro.go.jp]
Picture 5 [jetro.go.jp]
Use of Simputer for Spot Billing of Electricity Metering [picopeta.com]
More Case [picopeta.com]
Studies
See Simputer in action in the Bay Area (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/bill/)
The same speaker will be visiting the Linux Users' Group of Davis (LUGOD [lugod.org]) on October 20th [lugod.org], near Sacramento, Calif.
Re:Yeah, but... (Score:1, Offtopic)
(http://www.devinmoore.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday May 24 2007, @06:16AM)
I can't seem to find.. (Score:2)
Re:Not much point (Score:3, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Tuesday January 21 2003, @12:29PM)
That's true for us rich westerners.
Fancy smartphones are sold to us at a loss by the telcos because they assume (and it's a risk) that they'll recoup the cost as we use data services
over a fixed term contract with inclusive rental charges.
Ask Vodafone how much a P800 would cost with no contract and you might find the Simputer starts looking like good value for money.
And let's not assume that its only value is in the hands of random end users - who obviously can't afford it.
Take a nationwide census as an example. Put one of these in the hands of the (thousands of) census takers on the ground and they'll (hopefully) gather more accurate data faster. With this information it's possible to spend development money more wisely on those who are never going to see a computer in their lives.
Another example would be stock control of perishable foodstuffs, each employee in the warehouses would have one, the benefits are obvious.
Yes its "expensive" technology and beyond the reach of most, but that doesn't mean it can't be a worthwhile investment in the right circumstances. It may well be the cheapest (real) solution if the right apps get written.
I guess we'll have to wait and see...