OpenLaszlo 3.0 Announced

gse writes "The friendly folks at Laszlo Systems (of which I am one) have just announced the release of OpenLaszlo 3.0. Cool new features in this release: SOLO deployment (compile standalone .swf applications that don't need a proxy server), dynamically loadable libraries, a drawing API, and a bunch of optimizations. Info and downloads are at openlaszlo.org. (OpenLaszlo has been covered before on Slashdot.)"

I'm stunned

I'm stunned that there is not more of a response to this news here on Slashdot. OpenLaszlo is a great product. You can author some really nice applications using their framework, and it's open source to top if off.

The ability to deploy standalone SWF files is most definitely a direct result of the folks over at Laszlo opening the source. Before, the server side "engine" was, really, their product. You would have to install that in order to serve up a Laszlo application. This is just like Macromedia/Adobe's business model with Flex. When they opened the source, the first thing they wanted to do was be able to publish stand alone SWF files because now the business model no longer centered around their server app.

So how do they make their money now? Well, they've got a few big time clients using their technology, and who better to apply the technology than those who designed it? Laszlo now hopes to generate cash flow by offering professional laszlo development. This is the type of business plan I would love to see more software vendors follow. I really hope Laszlo thrives as a company.. it would really make a statement. It's a great addition to the open source community in an area that has been littered with closed-source solutions (RIA).

Re:I'm stunned

I'm stunned that there is not more of a response to this news here on Slashdot. OpenLaszlo is a great product. You can author some really nice applications using their framework, and it's open source to top if off.

Response is subdued because the Slashdot community is still reeling over the shocking news [slashdot.org] that the Wayback Machine [archive.org] web archive archives web pages, even extremely popular ones like Google.

Re:I'm stunned

Response is subdued because the Slashdot community is still reeling over the shocking news that the Wayback Machine web archive archives web pages, even extremely popular ones like Google.

It's funny you should say that. I posted the parent, and since

Re:I'm stunned

I'm stunned that there is not more of a response to this news here on Slashdot. OpenLaszlo is a great product.

OpenLaszlo may well be the killer product I'm looking for. I don't know. Why not?

BECAUSE THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE DOESN'T SAY WHAT THE FUCKING PROGRAM DOES!

There. Now I feel better.

I see it might having something to do with Flash, assuming that '.swf' isn't some project specific extension. I dunno.

Re:I'm stunned

Doh. Sorry about that.

Laszlo is a platform for creating rich internet applications. It competes directly with (and pre-dates) Macromedia Flex. We open-sourced it last fall.

OpenLaszlo targets the Flash player as its runtime; that decision was made due to Flash's ubiquity. But there's nothing to stop it from being retargeted to Java, .NET, XUL, whatever.

More info here: http://www.openlaszlo.com/faq/ [openlaszlo.com]

(note: I'm a Laszlo employee but these are my personal opinions)

Re:I'm stunned

Flash, Java, .NET, XUL, blah. If Laszlo really wants to make a difference, you should target AJAX. Focus less on reinventing the user interface with unintuitive sliding buttons everywhere (hint: users don't want to learn a whole new user interface paradi

Re:I'm stunned

> Flash, Java, .NET, XUL, blah. If Laszlo really wants to make a difference, you should target AJAX.

You miss the point totally . Flash had the first Ajax (stupid name - because he went crazy and killed himself) like implementation. You should look at

Re:I'm stunned

When I said "AJAX", I meant "HTML, CSS, and Javascript", not "interactive web application". I meant to specifically exclude all things Flash. Flash is not cool, was never cool and likely will stay uncool, especially at Adobe. There are so many reasons;

Re:I'm stunned

OK:

1. Requires a browser plugin.
2. Subverts normal web navigation, making it impossible to link to a certain part of a Flash site, and making the browser back/forward and history not work.
3. Doesn't use the normal page/link structure of the web, making Google

Re:I'm stunned

Oh, forgot one: not resizable. Flash is vector-graphics-based, and yet you hardly ever seen a Flash site that even allows their embedded Flash to resize with the browser window, much less change the font size (and don't even think about custom user CSS f

Re:I'm stunned-Copyright violaters.

There is a reason the web took off the way it has, like few other things before it, and continues to grow at an incredible rate even today, ushering in a whole new era of communication. And it's not because everybody's intellectual property has been safel

Re:I'm stunned

Does that mean that I can copy/paste my ActionScript2 source code from my FlashMX project into OL IDE, and generate SWF and jarfiles that run the same on Flash Player (7) and the JVM, respectively? How much regression test/revision is required?

Re:I'm stunned

It's a straight question. And I think that the full flowering of "p-code" and open interop is really promising: 3-tier architecture of a program's source/object/executable code can let us each write in whichever language we're most expressive, targeting wh

Re:I'm stunned

You have to remember that this is Slashdot, where Flash is the unholy hellspawn of Satan's own cock. In other words, this place is full of dumbass Luddites that can't deal with pretty pictures.

Style vs Substance

I wish I had point to mod you up. Slasdot's main problem is that most idiots here infer that, since substance is more important than style (which is true), the logical conclusion is to remove all style from everything.

There is life beyond a green terminal

Re:I'm stunned

I'm stunned that there is not more of a response to this news here on Slashdot.

Right, because folks have been crying out for a way to get even more frickin' Flash sites polluting the Web. I was looking at Laszlo a couple of weeks ago, and the backend loo

Flash Applications don't learn

I've yet to see a useful Flash MDI or desktop type application (like the http://openlaszlo.org/ [openlaszlo.org] demos) that was an improvement over a cleverly implemented HTML/javascript type application doing the same thing.

I suspose part of the problem is that the p

Flash is not a replacement, at best it's addition.

I dislike how little control users have over how Flash appears and works -- there are very good reasons why I use user stylesheets and set the font size on my browser so I can read text. There's also the problem of not having a free software Flash player

XUL is not a replacement

Well since it's open source. You all can modify it to spit out anything you want, up to and including XUL.

Three words

Flash must die.

Question: Flash and open source

I'm just wondering what the position of Flash and open source etc. Q1: Is the swf format open? i.e. are their any restrictions on creating clients which read swf or programs which can create swf. Q2: Is it API documented? Q3: Are there patent problems? Q4:

Re:Interesting, trivia

Uh? Isn't it a last name? As in Victor and Ilsa Laszlo?

Good ol' Boggie...

Re:Interesting, trivia

Actually, Laszlo is a hungarian first name, but it can be used as last name :) (Yes, I'm from Hungary)

Re:Interesting, trivia

The only Laszlo I know is Laszlo Carreidas [rael.free.fr], "the millionnaire who never laugh" in Flight 714 [tintinologist.org]. The first link show him as it is hypnotized by aliens. Not the best album in the collection.

Re:Interesting, trivia

My hovercraft is full of eels