Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

KDE Developers and Usability Folks on Cooperation

Posted by CowboyNeal on Thu May 12, 2005 05:25 PM
from the getting-together dept.
KDE GUI Software Programming IT Technology
sultanoslack writes "Over at NewsForge a story just popped up on the usability experts from OpenUsability and some of the issues on working with KDE development teams, specifically the KDE PIM team. There's some interesting content on the different working styles of the two groups as well as a little bit on some of the improvements that were part of the recent KDE 3.4 release."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

KDE Developers and Usability Folks on Cooperation 25 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.

  • Ignore the expert behind the curtain. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 12 2005, @05:32PM (#12514202)
    "Open Usability - Mission Statement

    OpenUsability.org is a project that brings open source developers and usability experts together.

    The idea behind is simple: There are many Usability Experts who want to contribute to software projects. And there are many developers who want to make their software more usable, and - as a consequence - more successful. "

    I'm going to ask because no one else will. How do you know they're usability experts? Who's doing the vetting?

  • Great! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 12 2005, @05:38PM (#12514234)
    Just wanted to share my excitement about this.

    I think it's great that the KDE Devs have no problem acknowledging that KDE could even be better if it focuses more on usability.

    Don't get me wrong, KDE is far from the usability nightmare some folks want to make it, however it certainly has issues and it certainly can use some polish. (As can probably any other environment out there for that matter)

    Now getting usability expert on board to solve these issues sure is the right way and if KDE 3.4 is anything to judge from, there are great things to come for KDE.

    Rock on!

  • How about working together with GNOME? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by mpontes (878663) on Thursday May 12 2005, @05:43PM (#12514263)
    Am I the only one who hates the way the whole GNU/Linux community is split up? There are already few apps (with a GUI) compared to Windows applications, if the community keeps splitting up, Linux will never pose a real threat to Windows in the desktop world. Your average PC user doesn't want to have to deal with a different look-and-feel every time he boots an application, so he'll be stuck with the apps that were developed for his desktop environment. Heck, I stick with Kopete because Gaim looks so damned ugly under KDE.

    Sure, I have a lot of choices under GNU/Linux. Too bad that for every choice I make I become more and more limited.

    • Am I the only one who hates the way the whole GNU/Linux community is split up?

      Unfortunately, no, you are not alone with this opinion. What you fail to see is that there developers are not droids. In other words, you can't think of them as a pool that you can shape into whatever form you like. You can't tell a GNOME developer to work for KDE because the latter has a better chance of success (as it seems now). The GNOME developer works on GNOME because that is what he wants to work on. And this is not necessarily a bad thing: competition between the two major desktop environments might be considered as a driving force behind the rapid growth of linux DEs actually.

      For instance GNOME and KDE have incompatible aims - they approach usability from different perspectives ("less is more" vs. "more and more, better organized" to put it very simply). On the other hand, standardization of low level services/components might be a good thing, and work is already in progress (albeit I have to admit it is slow) to achieve that via freedesktop.org. Also, you have to be aware of the contradiction of your post: your problem is that there is too much and too few choice at the same time. You'd prefer to use GAIM instead of kopete (you have a choice) but because you choose KDE, you have to use Kopete for a consistent look (no choice). The question you need to ask is this: what is the problem with Kopete? What I'm trying to say is that KDE's application stack becomes more and more complete. They have their own, well integrated office suite (koffice). They have kopete, music players, webbrowser, even a viable gimp replacement for average needs (have you seen krita in koffice 1.4beta? - it is absolutely fascinating!) - and so on.

      What needs to be done is to improve that application stack. So if Kopete is not fully satisfactory (you would like to use GAIM, don't you?) - than you should specify the problems. If a number of users agree with your claim - and that's the point of this article - you would be able to communicate your needs/problems to the developers, helping them improve the app you are currently 'forced' to use.

    • if the community keeps splitting up, Linux will never pose a real threat to Windows in the desktop world.

      The trouble with this kind of assessment is that not everyone in "the community" cares if Linux poses a threat to Windows. They just want to build what they think is great software.

  • My wish for KDE apps (Score:3, Interesting)

    by bogaboga (793279) on Thursday May 12 2005, @05:49PM (#12514302)
    My wish for KDE applications, in addition to supporting all that the usability guys are doing, is to be able to re-order all icons on the menu bar. It is some what possible now, but in many cases, you fire-up your application and find that the menu bar is disorganized! Re-ordering at this moment becomes impossible! After restarting the app, re-ordering may be possible.

    I can think of MS-Office, whose menu bar icons can be re-ordered in any way wanted. When one "squeezes" or forces another menu bar to share the same area with another, this is possible with arrows indicating the availability of other items beyond the arrow.

    That's my wish.

  • /.ers, what's wrong with you? (Score:5, Informative)

    by vlad_petric (94134) on Thursday May 12 2005, @05:53PM (#12514328) Homepage
    Usability (intuitiveness and "just works"-ness) is precisely what's keeping Linux from being adopted by the masses.

    This is one of the best news I've heard in years.

    • Re:/.ers, what's wrong with you? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Stevyn (691306) on Thursday May 12 2005, @06:11PM (#12514434)
      and before people say "but windows sucks too!", linux and the desktop environment have to be a LOT better to win people over.

      kioslaves is a major improvement. I plug a drive in, and an icon appears on the desktop. A thing I noticed randomly was if I scroll over the JuK tray icon, it skips to the next song. If I scroll over the speaker tray icon, the volume increases or decreases. When you go to rename a file, it highlights the name but not the extension because you rarely change the extension of a file. These of course are little things, but they do make a difference. There are also countless usability improvements that I can't think of right now.

      KDE has come along way since the days of 1.0 and I'm sure the pace is going to increase as more people get involved.

      So yeah, KDE is improving and at this pace, it may be a LOT better than windows. Of course that's before longhorn comes out and I'm sure a bunch of people are trying to get linux adoption up before that hype takes over.
    • Here's what I did today. I went to CompUSA and bought a 160GB Ultra ATA Drive. I popped open my Mac G4 and installed it. Then I partitioned the drive and installed OSX. Next I installed Ubuntu. Awesome distro. First time I've ever installed Linux on any machine anywhere. First thing I noticed: the email setup was different from standard practices. Next thing I noticed: Open menus and screens left trails on the monitor. Third thing: Gimp locked and the usual keyboard combinations to force quite didn'

  • Congrats (Score:4, Interesting)

    by molnarcs (675885) <molnarcs@@@gmail...com> on Thursday May 12 2005, @05:55PM (#12514337) Homepage Journal
    Hmmm... that's very nice. KDE can learn a lot from the pitfalls GNOME went through in their quest for usability. I'm thinking of the failure to provide facilities to establish communications between developers, users, and usability experts. This was one of the gripes of Eugenia not so long ago (and as much as I hate to admit it, she was right!). It seemed to me that the main problem was that usability changes was decided by fiat - spatial browsing as the default, reverse button order, and a few years ago, the file selector - there was and still is a sense that some of these are 'forced' down the users throat by developers who like to cite their HIG (yet they violate it in the next turn by frustrating user-expectations). Anyway, the sign that KDE is heading towards the right direction is the effort they put into providing a framework with the purpose of faciliating communication between users, experts and developers. What I have in mind is the bugzilla equivalent for usability suggestions/comments that the article mentions.

    The work they have done with KDE 3.4 speaks volumes about the success and the potential of these efforts. If you had problems with the 'clutter' of KDE before (I never had I might add) and haven't tried KDE 3.4... you should. And they did it without frustrating their present userbase: no features were removed, they were just reorganized. This seems to be the difference between gnome and kde approach to usability. GNOME seems to have the 'less is more' mantra, while KDE has the 'more, better organized' mantra. Both have its merits btw - I can very well imagine that GNOME's approach suits some user's taste better, so no flames please. Me, I love every feature, and those that I don't use can be easily removed (more easily than in previous KDE iterations).

    It is also interesting to see how developers had to be "converted" to cooperate with openusability folks - and it is really nice to hear that this has been a success story so far (11 KDE projects already work closely with openusability - and what's more, they enjoy it :) For instance:

    "The reports produced by OpenUsability are, according to Adam, "full of clear, concrete ideas that are well-reasoned, that have an overall vision, and that follow principles. They are also an appropriate length, without being too long or vague."

    Nice!

  • KDE Print (Score:3, Informative)

    by bogaboga (793279) on Thursday May 12 2005, @05:57PM (#12514344)
    Is it only me who finds that KDE Print just has too many icons, buttons and configuration options? Just take a look at this: http://printing.kde.org/screenshots/ [kde.org]. Without intimately knowing the system/environment you are working at, it might be impossible to setup a printer. It happened to me once...and I am not that much of a newbie. Or is it that I am not that bright?
    • I'm not a usability expert, but looking at the basic print dialogue [kde.org], I see a number of things that could be done differently. Ok, there's three main control areas on the page. The top one is labelled "Printer", the middle section can have different contents depending on which tab you are in, and the bottom area consists mostly of buttons.

      In the top area, there is a preview checkbox. Presumably this means print preview. But why is it in the printer control group? Is it previewing the printer? Why is

      • Re:KDE Print (Score:5, Insightful)

        by vegaspctech (769513) <vegaspctech@yahoo.com> on Thursday May 12 2005, @06:41PM (#12514659) Homepage Journal

        Seriously, I totally agree with you. I think kprinter actually is a very good example of the problems kde faces. Kprinter is technically an awsome tool if you take the time to really get into it. However the problem is, for simply setting up a local printer it is way to confusing.

        No, but your post is a very good example of the problems KDE, Gnome and the rest face, when it comes to adoption by Windows users. If something has a configuration option or two less than Windows does for the same thing, then it's not configurable enough. If it's got a configuration option or two more than Windows does, it's too confusing. I just pulled up the default Windows and vendor provided printer configuration panels on Windows 2k, XP and 98 SE and printer properties in Kprinter for KDE 3.4. Kprinter appears to have just a couple more options than the default Windows equivalent and a couple less than the configuration tools provided by Epson and Canon. The most significant difference I see is a matter of depth. In Kprinter and the Epson tool all the options appear to be presented at the same depth, a handful of tabbed pages in one window, while the Windows and Canon tools have buttons on some pages that open additional windows. The latter have most the same options as the former, they just hide more of them.

  • It pays off (Score:3, Insightful)

    by MemoryDragon (544441) on Friday May 13 2005, @02:36AM (#12517292)
    KPDF has seen such major improvements in usability in 3.4 that I was amazed, it is one of the best if not the best PDF readers in existence currently. Adobe could learn a lesson from KPDF. I really hope they wont follow the same approach as Gnome, just dumbing everything down and leaving the users who really need features like SCP over VFS, Tabbing and Splitting in Konqueror etc.. standing in the rain. But so far it looks very good. They did not dumb anything down, but understood usability to make a better ui but leave the power functions in (which can be locked out via kiosk if needed) One of the biggest problems Gnome had, was that they went the usability for idiots way and left their main base, which mostly are power users standing in the rain, the way, we take it out you will never have it in again.
      • Are you aware of the fact that you can configure almost every aspect of KDE - including colors, icons, style? Also, KDE doesn't have its own distribution - so it is up to distro makers to change the default look to whatever they like.

        ...but I am a programmer and user interface designer Yeah, sure, and you have a degree in communication as well I assume? (BLEAH. Positively BLEAH.). (Come on mods, who modded that post interesting?)

        • Those screenshots reflect a failing of open-source: their design is inconsistent, self-absorbed, cluttered, and useless.

          The screenshots do not show the default desktop, it show how this particular user has set up his desktop. So it merely shows that you can customize KDE to your exact liking. And I don't see how that is a "failing of open source".

          FWIW, my KDE-desktop looks like this [www.nbl.fi]. Quite a difference, no?

          Please: if you want to complain about KDE, do not use some heavily modified desktop as your basi

    • to paraphrase:

      "...sure xfce4 "seems" more consistent & integrated than kde but personally it seems like nothing but a Mac OS X ui hack, looks just like it dont it? I'm all for choice but after hearing so much about how crappy the Mac interface is what do we get in xfce4, same old thing. I use kde exclusively and will never change..."

      - just pointing out what has to be said: there's only so many ways to go in UI without a radical redesign of the computing world in general, and either you're going to loo
      • Are you kidding?

        What are you comparing it to? I have worked on a lot of large object oriented code bases (my day job is maintaining a LARGE finite-element code written in C++) and working in KDE is atleast an order of magnitude better than any large piece of code I can think of.

        There are very well laid out docs that describe the core pieces of the system and tie it all together with the Qt heritage. The inheritance trees is KDE are very good... with just the right amount of inherit and extend mixed in w
      • Qt programs are absolutely true C++ programs. If you don't want to use moc, you can write by hand all of the code that moc would generate for you.

        Paul.
    • I can make any Desktop environment look like crap by putting thousands of icons and applets on every panel, and leaving no room for things like the actual task bar. Which should be about 2 levels high anyway, if you want to have that many windows open. Check out my screenshot [kibbee.ca]
    • I still cannot see a single place that I can remove software that I install.

      K menu --> System -- Package Manager

      The task panel still not resizable using the mouse. And when you resize, the icons get larger (what good is that?)

      Resizing the task bar is not something the average user does every day. Once in a great while is more like it. I have *never* tried to resize it with my mouse, simply because I never resize the taskbar. The taskbar in KDE has a dozen more customization options than in Windo

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.