Ask Kent M. Pitman About Lisp, Scheme And More 353
Kent M. Pitman has been programming in Scheme and Lisp, and contributing to the design of those languages, for a long time -- 24 years. He was a technical contributor and an international representative for the ANSI subcommittee that standardized Common Lisp, and in that capacity directed the design of Lisp's error system. Scheme may be better known as a teaching language, but both Scheme and Lisp have applications (as any Emacs user knows) that go far beyond this. Now's your chance to ask him about the pros and cons of those two languages, circa 2001 A.D. Kent also has an interesting, ambivalent take on Free software that's worth noting in an atmosphere where complex issues are often oversimplified and radicalized. Since he's someone who's helped develop standards, this is perhaps a timely issue on which to probe his opinion. It's also a good time to get acquainted with things he's written, which might interest you just as much as his programming. (Soap opera parodies, anyone?) So suggest questions for Kent below (please, one per post) -- we'll pass along the highest-rated ones for him to answer, and Kent will get back soon with his answers.
Re:Summary? (Score:1, Informative)
Re:command on the left (Score:4, Informative)
(+ 2 (* x (/ x 3))) into a "derivative" method, which would examine that expression, MODIFY it, and return a completely valid new scheme method that was the actual mathematical derivative.
Very cool. The reason it could easily do this recursively is that the operators were bould with the arguments inside the same list.
Re:Lisp as a Macro Language (Score:2, Informative)
I can think of at least one other program that does: the Sawfish [sourceforge.net] window manager that's now the default WM for GNOME.
Re:Scheme in CS (Score:2, Informative)
Even if you don't use it, any programmer should at least code enough lisp to understand how elegant programming can be. Become one with the stack. Witness the power of (mapcar It's a completely different kind of mindset than the procedural languages.
Re:Scheme in CS (Score:3, Informative)
Aside from the scholastic value of lisp (or scheme) as a system of abstract logic, there is a thriving commercial industry - it's not huge, but it does include some big names - Yahoo, Orbitz.. the list goes on..