Is .NET Relevant to Game Developers? 563
andrew stuart asks: "We've heard an awful lot about how .NET is the future and how .NET signals the end for COM based Windows development, but how far does this go? Is it really the end of COM? Will ALL Windows programming be done with .NET? What about games development? Will games be developed with .NET? If games aren't developed with .NET and Microsoft is killing COM, then what future for games development on Windows? Will there be DirectX for .NET?"
it went down like this (Score:2, Funny)
Steve: yes
Bill: is windows secure and stable yet
It is stormy in the pacific northwest, rains and cold have been present for the past several days
Steve: (sick with the flu, congested, and tired from jumping) not yet
Bill: Dot Net, that's it. (picks up phone) "marketing, this is bill. we're going with dot net, steve says so."
Re:Yes (Score:2, Funny)
Re:That Giant Sucking Sound... (Score:3, Funny)
Why not? Imagine playing Quake to create your next spreadsheet! "Quick! There's AA51! Where's my BFG9000 when I need it?"
Re:Dotnet won't rule the world. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Doubtful. (Score:5, Funny)
I think that's probably the most easily-disproved wild assertion I've ever read, even on
There should be a special prize or something.
Re:I call bullshit (Score:3, Funny)
Whoa, I could have sworn I saw them as far back as 1998.
Re:That Giant Sucking Sound... (Score:1, Funny)
Yeah. The difference for me was that the non-native Java gui on my Cyrix P-133+ with 16 MB of RAM was at least 4 times as slow as VB.Net on my P4 2.4 GHz with 512 MB RAM.
Sample game written in VB.net (Score:3, Funny)
Re:What exactly is the point of .NET? (Score:3, Funny)
Of course it's cross-platform. It runs on 2000, XP and
NET .COM (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Doubtful. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Proper implementation would have saved this (Score:3, Funny)
But... How would you write efficient code if your functions didn't have helpful names like DDLockBufferAndBlitToSurfaceAndPrayThePointerIsVa
.what? (Score:2, Funny)