Google Code Jam 2003 Announced 303
An anonymous reader says "O'Reilly Developer News is reporting details of the newest Google programming contest, Google Code Jam 2003. Prizes range from t-shirts to ten grand and you can use any programming language you want to solve the increasingly challenging problems."
Update by J : ... as long as it's Java, C++, C# or VB.NET.
C++ only? (Score:5, Interesting)
Looking for telecommuters? (Score:5, Interesting)
Here's what Google values, from their Job Opportunities [google.com] page: What intrigues me personally is that this contest takes place in an online collaborative environment. Does this mean that Google is considering opening up to remote working -- as in, I can live in Dallas and "work" in the Googleplex? As much as I'd love to work at a place like Google, there's no way I'm moving to Cali-fall-into-the-ocean-fornia [slashdot.org].
Uhhh... Specs, please (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Cheap Labor (Score:5, Interesting)
run a competition and let others do the coding for you.
oh and don't forget to through in a t-shirt or to for all the hard work
And lather, rinse, repeat if you're after some original designs for t-shirts for your website...
To be honest, I like the idea of this Google competition. I'm not going to be winning it (my programming skills aren't fantastic) but it's a great way of fostering relationships between you and your user base, finding good coders (and potential future employees), getting some good code and/or code ideas and, above all, having a little bit of fun with the community as a whole.
If all companies were like Google then we'd all be happy as Jay and Silent Bob at a weedfest.
Re:TopCoder! Is Pure Evil (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Not quite ANY programming language... (Score:3, Interesting)
TopCoder competitions low on quality (Score:5, Interesting)
I was disappointed with my experience in the TopCoder competition at Java One because even on day three, when I was comfortable with the TopCoder IDE, knew that speed was king, and I knew the solution right away I was still beaten out by over two minutes. I mean, I knew the solution, typed it in, compiled first time, ran a test case, passed, and submitted the solution. Damn near perfect in my mind but I was very low man on the totem pole time-wise (~4min vs ~2min).
I guess learning to touch type by MUDing just doesn't cut it
flee
flee
flee
Bleh, sounds like a regular topcoder compo (Score:3, Interesting)
Anyone remember when TopCoder gave out TONS of money? They would give out cash to 3/8th of the participants like 3x as week. It rocked. And it was distributed to each 'room' so you only had to compete against 8 other people (so in order to get cash you only needed to beat 5 people). Despite this, I only placed once
The craziest thing was that they started this after the dot-com crash, so everyone thought they were basically insane, but we were happy to take free money
Anyway I might play this time around. Of course, you'll need to do better then n-249, rather then 3 but it still might be fun
TC used to allow C++ though, I wonder why they gave up on that.
Re:Programming competitions, give me a break (Score:1, Interesting)
The problems you are described occur because of management problems.
Re:TopCoder! (Score:4, Interesting)
Still, it was nice when they were awarding $300 for first place in your room in Division I for contests every week. When they dropped the prize money for weekly matches, there wasn't a compelling reason to spend my time on it.
Re:Please define "any programming language"... (Score:1, Interesting)
But that's not the real problem. The real problem is they've provided a choice of four languages which are all based in the same programming paradigm. What's missing from their list of approved languages? Well, how about any functional languages -- ML/OCAML, Haskell, heck I'd even settle for LISP! Modern functional language compilers now produce code whose runtime rivals that of C or C++ (of course when your bug rate drops an order of magnitude, and you can concentrate on algorithms instead of low-level implementation, that's the least of your concerns!)
What about Prolog? If runtime speed isn't an issue, it's an ideal fit for many AI problems. I've even found myself using oddballs like Forth in the real world.
A good programmer, just like a good physician or a good carpenter, becomes fluent in the tools of the trade and selects them according to the problem domain. Having a programming contest in which only OO languages are permitted is like having a cabinet-making contest in which all work must be done with screwdrivers.
Re:TopCoder! Is Pure Evil (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:TopCoder competitions low on quality (Score:3, Interesting)
Other fun Google recruiting methods (Score:3, Interesting)
Inverted Index [google.com]
Page Rank [google.com]
Suffix Array [google.com]
They've even put some individual researchers' names in for sponsored links:
Udi Manber [google.com]
Gene Myers [google.com]
It's interesting, as they seem to have some things but not others. The suffix array stuff is useful for full-text indexing, which they may be interested in, but they don't flag searches on more recent topics in the field.
Could have predicted tenor of threads.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Anyhow, all bull$hit aside concerning Lisp, Python, Haskell, Modula-2, Ada, COBOL, ALGOL, FORTRAN, and whatever other nonesense I saw, I'd like to see some of the socially challenged here at /. put their money where their hacking chops are (assuming that their mom's will let them stay up past their bedtime)
It would be amusing to see those who would engage in mindless holy wars put their programming chops to the test, and earn some legitimate bragging rights
I agree with a previous poster that it would be useful to have more contests like this - Here is my programming assignment for you:
Using a computer language of your choice, write a program that will factor a very large integer of arbitrary precision (1024+ digits) in as little time as possible - Points awarded on speed of execution
8^)
Re:As the lady said, faster's not NECESSARY better (Score:2, Interesting)
I've adopted the habit to always search for a rapid solution of a problem and then once I have a functional code I start to optimize,build, rebuild and defragment it in smaller modules.
I Have a friend who at the same time is uncapable of coding anything at all before writing down some project design notes on paper.
You'll be surprised how often at the end we arrive at the same solution(at least we're surprised;o))).
So,back on your point, fast coding != robust, durable, re-usable code, but I don't really see a way to put a note on those for a competition purposes or am I wrong?????
Re:TopCoder competitions low on quality (Score:1, Interesting)
In fact this is how many of hte early competitions went. The upper echelon of competitors also happened to write problems. Sure they would be exempt from competing when it was their problems on the block, but they freqently cavorted their submitted problems between each other.
What was worse is that TopCoder used to round robin the top people so that most of them competed in their own rooms. This was eventually changed.
There were countless other "cheats" to winning with TopCoder.