Alternatives To SF.net's CompileFarm? 186
cronie writes "Not long ago, SourceForge.net announced the shutdown of the Compile Farm — a collection of computers running a wide variety of OSes, available for compiling and testing open source projects. SF.net stated their resources 'are best used at this time in improving other parts' of the service. I consider this sad news for the OSS community, because portability is one of the strengths of OSS, and not many of us have access to such a variety of platforms to compile and test our software on. As a consequence, I expect many projects dropping support for some of the platforms they can't get access to. Are there any sound alternatives with at least some popular OS/hardware combinations? Any plans to create one? (Perhaps Google or IBM might come up with something?)"
Re:Virtualisation negates the need for a compile f (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Vendor support... (Score:3, Insightful)
Industry moving forward (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:They announced this AFTER the shutdown? (Score:4, Insightful)
It was announced afterwards for a reason. They're not really taking it down because nobody wants it or anything, it's because they lack manpower to keep it working. It basically needs a lot of work to get it back in a usable state, and it's not widely used, so they're just dropping it.
This is the classic downside of "software as a service".
Re:not to be a jerk but... (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Obvious (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Vendor support... (Score:2, Insightful)
True, but remember that the more software that eventually runs on your platform, the more people who are likely to adopt it.
Re:Industry moving forward (Score:5, Insightful)
There are so many exceptions to what software-as-a-service can reasonably do that the majority of people who are reading this do on a daily basis that I just have to laugh when people bring this up. Beyond a wet dream for Microsoft where they lovingly sit back and watch the monthly subscription dollars roll in, this is never going to happen.
Re:Can we start a replacement project (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Industry moving forward (Score:1, Insightful)
It wasn't so long ago that a whole COUNTRY (Pakistan) lost its internet access because one cable was damaged.
Traditional software ain't going away anytime soon.
Re:Industry moving forward (Score:3, Insightful)
Now implement a cryptography library on the "software as a service" model. Oops, you're sending plain text data through the cables...
Now implement a real time application on the "software as a service" model.
Now implement an application which requires near-100% availability on the "software as a service" model.
Now implement a high-end game on the "software as a service" model.
Are you done? Do you like the results?
Re:Vendor support... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Virtualisation negates the need for a compile f (Score:2, Insightful)
And even if you don't see a problem with it, what about those OS devs who do actually kind of like the idea of testing on a variety of hardware? There aren't many hobbyists who can afford to buy servers from HP and IBM.
Re:Virtualisation negates the need for a compile f (Score:3, Insightful)
For most open source software you're completely correct - it'll never run on anything more exotic than a Core Duo. But if you're developing something other than desktop applications (e.g. programming languages, libraries, frameworks, etc) and you want your software to be used by the widest possible audience; you need to test it on as many architectures and operating systems as possible.
Usage stats? (Score:3, Insightful)
Do we have any actual data on how popular the service was? I think this was a neat idea, but if it wasn't being used it won't be missed...
Re:VMs (Score:4, Insightful)
I believe he meant this [ibm.com] kind of power.
Re:Vendor support... (Score:2, Insightful)
No more easy nightly compiles of cvs/svn (Score:1, Insightful)