Which Freelance Developer Sites Are Worth Your Time? 55
Nerval's Lobster writes: Many websites allow you to look for freelance programming jobs or Web development work. (Hongkiat.com, for example, offers links to several dozen.) The problem for developers in the European Union and the United States is that competition from rivals in developing countries is crushing fees for everybody, as the latter can often undercut on price. (This isn't a situation unique to software development; look at how globalization has compelled manufacturing jobs to move offshore, for example.) With all that in mind, developer David Bolton surveyed some freelance developer marketplaces, especially the ones that catered to Western developers, who typically need to operate at price-points higher than that of their counterparts in many developing nations. His conclusion? "It's my impression that the bottom has already been reached, in terms of contractor pricing; to compete these days, it's not just a question of price, but also quality and speed." Do you agree?
Re: (Score:1)
Further more, out of experience, especially for bigger projects, taking in freelancers is a very bad idea : :
- You lose the knowledge about the project
- in case of evolution you need to find the same freelancer hoping he/she will be able and have the time to do the job
- If there's a problem,
- your own developpers will be pulling out their hair because it's not compliant to their way of working (or worse unreadable spaghetti code)
Re: (Score:2)
Letting all the people with all the knowledge go is indeed not so smart. You better have a development team with both employees and freelancers. So knowledge about the software keeps inside the company. Working with employees only has the danger of getting tunnel vision: "This is what we always did and it works for us". Working with (experienced) freelancers has the benefit of bringing in new knowledge and new insights.
Of course you also need to have some code standards, but there's no difference between em
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I've been working as a contract software developer for a few years now. I feel like I get a out of working on different projects. I meet smart people who have stayed in the same place for years. They definitely have the advantage of deep knowledge of the environment, but I find that they often lack breadth of knowledge sometimes.
Re:NONE (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Letting all the people with all the knowledge go is indeed not so smart.
And yet that became pretty much the norm since the 1980s and "perma-temp" employees.
At least as a freelancer, there's no pretense about being valuable corporate assets.
Re: (Score:2)
That can be managed, but it usually costs more, because you need to pay the freelancer for producing docs. Same thing goes for guarantees and code quality: you get what you pay for.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Further more, out of experience, especially for bigger projects, taking in freelancers is a very bad idea : - You lose the knowledge about the project : - in case of evolution you need to find the same freelancer hoping he/she will be able and have the time to do the job
Only if the hiring party is being cheap and/or is relying on "wishful thinking" documentation (what if one of your in-house devs with a lot of knowledge gets hit by a bus?). A well-run project will have documentation requirements that the freelancer has to implement.
- If there's a problem, - your own developpers will be pulling out their hair because it's not compliant to their way of working (or worse unreadable spaghetti code)
Why would you pay a freelancer to develop code that isn't compliant to in-house standards?
- no garantees, you've already validated and payed the freelancer, yer on yer own.
need to go on?
And again - why would you hire a freelancer under a contract with no warranty if you feel that is important to your business (because you don't trust your
Re: (Score:2)
Why would you pay a freelancer to develop code that isn't compliant to in-house standards?
Because the in-house coding standards never match the actual institutional knowledge. For example, I checked in a bunch of code using exceptions only to get an apologetic email asking if I could remove them because while it's not an official policy any more and in fact there are exceptions in some bits of code, they're still undecided on whether to support historic android versions which aren't mentioned in the coding
Re: (Score:1)
About the contract:
The framework contract/service agreement I work with is about 6 pages of actual text. It's
Re: (Score:2)
Your anecdotes don't contradict what I said - your client reviewed your commits and requested further changes for actual compliance before acceptance.
I wasn't trying to contradict what you said, really. I was just chatting on a forum. That one was of course a very good contract, but even so there is friction because the contractor isn't part of the organisation.
The framework contract/service agreement I work with is about 6 pages of actual text.
Oh, that's not long. That's actually on the short side! I was t
Re: (Score:1)
A contract won't save you from IR35 compliance issues: it's specifically designed to catch people who are for all intents and purposes employees even if they're on a contract. Though of course the lawyers and accountants will tell you if you'll get on the wrong side of IR35 by sticking to it.
I know, but the companies I have worked with have all been very understanding of the IR35-specific clauses and how important it is that we actually *work* this way. The contract's only one piece of the story, but it is a good way to get the story across to companies that aren't familiar with IR35 and start off thinking they can treat you like "just an employee".
IR35 is a mess. No-one can actually tell you for sure what'll happen.
Re: (Score:2)
As a matter of curiosity, you submitted code that presumably worked well, and conformed to all the standards given, so who paid for the rewrite? Or was it not worth worrying about because it wasn't that big?
Re: (Score:2)
I was on a fixed time contract, not a fixed work one. The project had a definite end date beyond which it could not extend.
Actually in a number of ways, they were my best customer. They paid well, and on a day rate, not a fixed fee. Also, the people I was working with were all super competent and really knew their stuff.
After dealing with the nightmare of legal and purchasing (it was a Very Big Company (tm)), it was the a dream :)
Re: (Score:2)
None (Score:5, Insightful)
But the problem isn't the 3rd world developers, its the unrealistic buyers. They aren't companies that understand tech, they're mostly individuals who don't understand that programming is work and want the sun, moon, and stars for a hundred bucks. Worse they don't know what they want or need, they just know they want/need something. You have to be designer, project manager, and developer in one, for a 3rd world salary. I don't think very many of the projects there are successful, and those that are tend to be the very simplest ones. If you have access to any job in the US, its just not worth doing. You'll make more per hour job hopping or putting the extra time into your real job in hopes of a raise/bonus.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed.
Jobs with specs like.
"I want to create the next facebook only better, max bid $100
It should be easy. All You Have To Do Is...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I always tell clients to try to avoid the three most expensive words said to software developers: "Can't you just...?"
Any sentence that starts with the words "can't you just" is going to be very, very expensive and the answer should almost always be "no". If you want a new piece of software or a feature added to an existing piece of software, explain it to me clearly without 1) being a condescending know-it-all, 2) being cheap, and 3) doing the design and architecture up front, because presumably that's wha
Re: (Score:2)
Funny thing is, even as a very experienced developer, I often fall prey to my own version of that: "All I Wanted To Do Was..."
That's the truly horrific thing about AYHTDI Syndrome. Unlike most professional afflictions, it's just as prevalent among the practitioners as it is among the clients.
Computers are stupid. They can't "just" do anything. People estimate work requirements based on what it would take to get another person to do something, and even in those cases, they're usually over-optimistic.
You can compensate. Just take the AYHTDI figure and triple it. That usually comes out close for me.
Unfortunately, people don't want to
Re: (Score:3)
I would agree.
I glanced at these requests. I have 30+ years of developing experience, and a lot of these requests are red flags request where you are expected to read the guys mind, to give them something that is often simple to explain, however requiring a lot of completed development process.
I need a program that takes some input (from the User, from the network, or from a file) do some processing, then provide an output. Sounds easy, you can do that under $1000 right?
In general for this type of work, we
Re: (Score:2)
Hmm, the problem I see is for many organizations, if we're going to pay someone hourly, we'd basically need to hire them anyway, so why bother with freelancing. Otherwise, we just worry (and have been victim of) people just dragging out their tasks to raise billable hours.
For outsourcing, we have to get set amounts approved. So per milestone or per project. Of course, that's not universal, many places could do per hour open ended.
Other Freelance Platforms (Score:2)
So this topic is somewhat relevant to my business. I don't really have any talent for or interest in coding, but I am what I guess you'd call a Freelance Technician. I do a lot of what I'd refer to as 'smart hands' jobs that don't really require a huge amount of technical know how, provided you can read directions. In-Warranty repair of items that can't be easily shipped is a common case where companies need someone who can swap a bad part for a good one, but don't really want to hire a dedicated person fo
Re: (Score:2)
That's how Labor Certification fraud works (Score:1)
you'd be required to finish the code BEFORE the job is even posted!
If only that part weren't true, since that's the way guest worker fraud works - itself being a close relative to freelancers.
Maybe not in money, but... (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
There's plenty of freelancers on Elance who do over 100K a year. It's often public in their profile / application. How do you explain that?
Usually, the "person" actually farms the contracts out to a team of subcontractors in Sao Palo, and then takes credit for having done all the work themselves.
Re: (Score:3)
No, I'm talking about solo contractors with high reputation. Hiring out to shoddy subcontractors will affect your reputation and actually prevent you from making more.
I think you are misunderstanding. You farm the *same* project out to 6 *different* subcontractors, and take the best one, and present it as your work product. Wash, rinse repeat.
It's also possible to get to that point with one lucky contract, but you can bet that if someone is making 100K at one of these sites, they can make 500K by hanging out their own shingle instead of using the site as an intermediary, and paying site fees. Reputation is not some score on some web site, reputation is something which
Re: (Score:2)
There's plenty of freelancers on Elance who do over 100K a year. It's often public in their profile / application. How do you explain that?
Elance can be good for some things. I've found that they simply don't know how to handle the "hurry-up-and-wait" type of project management that's prevalent in corporations.
Elance wants the money in a steady stream and they want it sooner rather than later. When contractors and customers find a good match but they have schedules/resources that don't fit in with that model, Elance fails to make allowances.
Re: (Score:1)
If those are your sales vector, you're in trouble (Score:3)
If sites like those are your primary sales vector, you're better off at a counter at McD's. Seriously.
As a freelancer, a website (your own!) is mostly or even - most of the time - *only* an amplifier for contacts established in person. You want to do projects for people who couldn't be bothered to look into the internet. You talk to them, give them your card and when they check you out on the web they find this awesome site that underlines and emphasises every positive impression you made. Then they grab the phone and call you. That's what you want. Anything else is non-sense.
Project websites are scooping territory for shady headhunters at best and at worst and most of the time the software developments equivalent of a used-car-sales lot or a flea market.
Exception (sort of) / When registering with a project site might be feasible:
There is one thing were some of the more respectable sites - often those that cost a monthly fee to joing - are a good sales vector: When you are a specialist who's exotic or rare field can easyly be searched for. For instance, if you're particularly good as a Java Developer for some specific environment like JBoss or an SAP ABAP developer or some ultra-certified Oracle person, then the more professional project sites might get you the one or other Gig and the one or other stream of projects going. But even then, these are only a side-orchestra.
Never rely on such sites as your main soucre of income. Stretch out your feelers and get in contact with folks in the real world, that's where the money is anyway. As a specialist freelancer - and in IT you always are a specialist - networking, paperwork and relations is at least 50% of the work.
Good luck from a fellow (former/semi) freelancer.
Chinese restaurant syndrome (Score:5, Interesting)
All of these "marketplaces" typically suffer from what I call "Chinese restaurant syndrome".
Every month or so, a new Chinese restaurant opens in this little office park my area. The undercut prices by as much as 20% the existing Chinese restaurant in the same office park, and attempt to lure in customers with a lower price. Which they do successfully. The restaurant that was already in that little office park goes under, not having any float to carry themselves over, since they spent all of it establishing themselves the same way.
Then you end up with one Chinese restaurant in the office park.
Then, having established customers, and eliminated their competition, they raise their prices. Which is OK, they are the only game in town, and their prices were absurdly (read: loss-leader) low in the first place. They surprisingly believe that in establishing a customer base, they have also bought those customers future loyalty - which they have not.
Then a new Chinese restaurant opens, and the cycle repeats: a long daisy-chain of new Chinese restaurants. I imagine them stretching, down through time, until Deckard from Blade Runner eats at one of them.
The point is, that the "consultants" on these sites are all new Chinese restaurants. There is always someone who will take a loss on a project in order to "establish themselves", and then try to raise their bid price, based on whatever passes for a "reputation scoring system" on the site in question.
Consumers of the site, however, look at everyone who bids on their job as fungible, and unless someone with a terrible "reputation score" is stupid enough to believe they will ever be hired by anyone, ever again, the lowest bidder always wins the bid.
A long chain of Chinese restaurants, stretching down through time...
And the only kind of jobs that are on that site are going to be jobs where the outcome is "nice to have, but not required", meaning they'll be happily surprised if the bidder produces something usable, but they really don't care if they totally screw up, since it's a slot machine pull anyway, and they only invested a nickel in the slots to begin with.
It's basically a sucker bet for the bidder, and a sucker bet for the person bidding, with the only winner being "The House" - the site hosting the arrangement.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a "chinese restaurant" among the marketplace, too.
A few years ago I set up seller accounts on three of them. One of those marketplaces bought out the other two, so now I have one account (luckily they allowed me to merge the accounts, with some loss of history).
Nothing new... (Score:1)
As the saying goes...
Price, quality, speed - pick two. The article doesn't seem to say any more than this. The foreign consultants apparently are very good at the price aspect.
scriptlance (Score:1)
Freelancers (Score:1)