Personally, I think it's not only quite funny, but a great way to get people involved and interested in perl who might have only glanced upon perl before.
So to sum up this article, if you add this at the top of your Perl programs:
use Symbol::Approx::Sub;
use Coy;
Then not only will your Perl be even less decipherable than normal Perl code (wow!), but the errors you get from it will be hidden in lines of poetry! No self-respecting programmer would have it any other way...
Now, it's back to debugging my program for me:
-----
Two old men encounter
beside a pond. A swallow
flying. Two trout.
-----
Lao Tse's commentary...
Execution of./new.pl aborted due to compilation errors.
You didn't read the article. There are several Perl packages available that are related to LoTR: Date::Discordian, to print Discordian dates, Date::Tolkien::Shire, which does a 'today in history' for LoTR. Others are mentioned, but those are the ones specific to LoTR.
While I think its probably irrelevant to point out that I've read the article, I don't suppose you could remind me of the link between Date::Discordian (something clearly inspired by the brilliance of the Illuminatus! trilogy) and LoTR? I know that Leviathon references LoTR as well, but is there something else?
I remember when I used to use Matlab, there was a funtion called "Why". It used to spit out these silly answers. It somehow made using Matlab slightly less tedious.
This is just like all the hidden easter eggs in programs written by most programmers. (The built in screen saver in some versions of Word does not count.)
Me too... I was expecting some Dick Clark-hosted blooper-reel footage of when Strom Thurmond met with some animals and kids, but with hilarious and disasterous results!
Perhaps the author should get in touch with the wacky ophthalmologist responsible for this site [tripod.com] and pick up a few tips on making indecipherable humor err...decipherable.
From seeing the trailer it looks like there might be a 1/2 decent movie to come out in 2001. Best I've see so far is Zoolander and that doesnt say much.
Unfortunately, it turns out that he's like one of those annoying five-year-olds who thinks a joke gets funnier if you repeat it over and over again. He's been telling this joke for about 14 years now.
The synchronicity machine clicked, and the name of Eris adorned his prose. The author is one of us without any doubt. Funny I followed a Perl link, being a wannabe Pythonista and all that cal, but the Discordian reference made it all blissfully clear in a very obscure manner - the usual tool of the old girl, eh? All hail Discordia!
Does it really seem like a good idea to have our computers guessing about what we mean? To be honest, they're not smart enough for me to trust them with that kind of authority quite yet. Until my computer can actually construct a useful PERL routine and explain its reasoning to me, I don't really want it guessing which one I meant by my typo...
is it any better to have Microsoft guessing (or telling) us what we want? Actually computers already tend to guess what we mean on a regular basis. That's what spell/grammar checking does.
I can't believe the article did not mention ACME::Bleach [cpan.org] which just bleaches your program. Run it once and your code magically disappears... but still runs!
ACME::Buffy [cpan.org] is similar, except your program is turned into a Buffy mantra that can be chanted or executed.
In fact the whole ACME [cpan.org] name space is reserved just for silly and incredibly useful modules.
And who said that quantum computers a centurys away?? You can get started on your 386 right now, courtesy of CPAN!
Also, about that eliza chatbot: there is an easier way to get started (you may have seen this in this months linux journal, non?):
$ emacs
esc
shift-X
doctor
And there you go - a psychotherapist built right into your text editor. Perfect for those times when that fscking bug makes you want to give it all up...
Anyway, next time someone complains about MS bloatware being so cheeky that they included a flight sim in a version of Excel, I shall point this out!
...you might be better off investigating the Time::Human module by Simon Cozens. This creates person-friendly descriptions of a time, transforming the excessively precise 00:23:12.00 into a positively laid-back ``coming up to 25 past midnight.''
I've surfed around CPAN, google, and Simon Cozens' home page but can't find this module. Can anybody point me to it?
Support (Score:2, Informative)
Obufscated Haiku'd Perl (Score:5, Funny)
Now, it's back to debugging my program for me:
Decoded Geekcode from the article (Score:3, Informative)
--
Re:WTF? (Score:2)
Re:WTF? (Score:1)
Sorry if I'm being dumb...
Matlab (Score:4, Interesting)
This is just like all the hidden easter eggs in programs written by most programmers. (The built in screen saver in some versions of Word does not count.)
Re:Matlab (Score:4, Insightful)
Is that the blue one with the white letters and the cryptic message?
Re:Matlab (Score:2)
Totally misread the headline (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Totally misread the headline (Score:1)
She wore a PERL necklace (Score:1)
LOTR (Score:1)
Re:LOTR (Score:2)
Re:LOTR (Score:1)
I always thought... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I always thought... (Score:1)
Eris strikes again (Score:1)
Re:Eris strikes again (Score:1)
Hmmmm..... (Score:1)
Re:Hmmmm..... (Score:1)
Re:Hmmmm..... (Score:1)
More serious modules (Score:5, Funny)
I can't believe the article did not mention ACME::Bleach [cpan.org] which just bleaches your program. Run it once and your code magically disappears... but still runs!
ACME::Buffy [cpan.org] is similar, except your program is turned into a Buffy mantra that can be chanted or executed.
In fact the whole ACME [cpan.org] name space is reserved just for silly and incredibly useful modules.
Re:Let me get this straight... (Score:1)
They missed another good one (Score:3, Interesting)
Quantum::Entaglement [perl.com]
And who said that quantum computers a centurys away?? You can get started on your 386 right now, courtesy of CPAN!
Also, about that eliza chatbot: there is an easier way to get started (you may have seen this in this months linux journal, non?):
$ emacs
esc
shift-X
doctor
And there you go - a psychotherapist built right into your text editor. Perfect for those times when that fscking bug makes you want to give it all up...
Anyway, next time someone complains about MS bloatware being so cheeky that they included a flight sim in a version of Excel, I shall point this out!
Re:They missed another good one (Score:1)
$ emacs
esc
shift-X
doctor
you don't need the Shift. Just esc x doc (tab to autocomplete) will do.
Or use your meta key in place of esc, if you have one. Often mapped to L-alt on Linux distros.
Re:They missed another good one (Score:1)
i'm actually a vi man myself, which explains my long route.
anyways, we dont want to get into that discussion do we....
must get round to learning emacs one of these days (im a nix begginer, see...), but vi suits my needs for now.
Marcus
Re:They missed another good one (Score:1)
M-x doctor-strangelove
On first glance.... (Score:2, Funny)
Of *course* Perl is funny! (Score:2)
I've known for a long time that Perl is a funny language. After all, its creator, "Larry Wall", definitely has a sense of humour.
The proof of this, of course, is right here [stonehenge.com], and here [yahooligans.com].
Where is Time::Human? (Score:1)
Re:Where is Time::Human? (Score:2)
The Song (Score:4, Funny)
Perl, It's my new obsession
Perl!~/\?/
Perls on the neck of your lover
'coz Perl gives you stuff to discover
Perl at the bin in my /usr
- you could be my dromedaryPerl, cos you are no luser
Perl, it's the coding with passion
cos() today it just goes with the Slashdot
'coz Perl is a lingo so scary
Perl likes its vars with the dollar
it's curled but you don't ever tell 'er, yeah I want to be your regex
I wanna doc you in latex
Perl on the screens that we key on
Perl, do I hate that one python, yeah