Independent Print Zine for Python Developers 14
Bryan Richard writes: "In the grand tradition of shameless self-promotion, I thought you might like to hear about my print zine Py. The first issue is already out and the second ships in June 2002. Articles in the first issue range from extending Python with C by Alex Martelli, author of the forthcoming Python in a Nutshell, to CGI template processing to scientific programming with Numeric. Learn all you like at www.PyZine.com. In a small way, picking up where OSPJ left off."
There must be a better way... (Score:2)
I was not about to shell out 3 bucks just to find out if the content was worth the price. Even if it was this time around it may not be so in the future.
I would like to suggest to the editors of PyZine that they consider providing some content for no charge. Sites such as Salon, to which I subscribe, have found this to be a successful compromise between free and paid content.
As for the issue of why this submission was accepted by slashdot, I will assume that it was done in good faith and not for advertising revenue. I would be very dissapointed if it was in actuality an Ad. Particularly after all of the uproar over this very issue with search engines in past slashdot posts.
Re:There must be a better way... (Score:3, Informative)
bihoy is correct, there are no articles on the site. And while that is comman practice, I (and I am the only person behind Py other than the contributors) don't have the resources of a Salon and have never much liked the "here's a taste pay for more" model. Regardless if its sells a couple more copies or not.
The focus of Py is about promoting a language I very much enjoy and crafting a quality product not about baiting a trap. If I post one article from an issue and the rest suck you will twice upset for the poor writing and being duped into buying.
The zine is there. You can buy it or not. If you or anyone else thinks they got a raw deal they can have all 3 of their dollars back.
Bryan Richard, Editor
Py
Re:There must be a better way... (Score:2, Insightful)
I brought the first issue and think that it shows great promise. So if you are Python user and would like to see useful, real world articles I suggest you support Py by subscribing and writing articles.
Re:There must be a better way... (Score:1)
jcrowe
Wankers, Tossers undt /. Fa'gits (Score:1)
Can you say "conflict of interest", bum buddies?