Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

A Debriefing On Debian's Woody Release 17

Posted by timothy on Monday July 29, 2002 @07:45AM from the freedom-of-information dept.

solferino writes: "Anthony Towns has posted a fairly detailed 'retrospective' on the release of woody and an 'introspective' on the future release of sarge." This is a long, informative read for anyone interested in how the complicated Debian release process plays out behind the scenes. ("Grep for 'realistic schedule'. Doh.")

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A Debriefing On Debian's Woody Release

Load All Comments

Search 17 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

Must.... release.... faster..... (Score:1)

by Captain Pedantic ( 531610 ) writes:

The same thing they said two years ago after Potato was released. Ho hum.

Still, nothing beats it, and I'm running a standard release for the first time in, um, two years.
Comments about boot floppies are now obsolete (Score:2, Interesting)

by psgalbraith ( 200580 ) writes:

debian-installer is not only the official way to boot for sarge, but boot-floppies are declared dead:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2002/debian -project-200207/msg00094.html [debian.org]
- boot floppy reinvention.. yet again? (Score:2)
  
  by cpeterso ( 19082 ) writes:
  
  Why does Debian completely rewrite their installer and boot floppies for each release? They can't seem to choose a design they can stick with. Both Woody and Potato suffered from buggy boot floppies that were delivered WAY past schedule, delaying the entire Debian release..
DVD Version of Woody (Score:3, Funny)

by Some guy named Chris ( 9720 ) writes: on Monday July 29, 2002 @05:04PM (#3974521) Journal

I downloaded the DVD version, but when I tried to play it in my DVD player, all I got was Richard Stallman on my TV yelling "It's GNU /Linux!".

Share
twitter facebook
Hehe... woody... release.... (Score:1)

by jzarzosa ( 584990 ) writes:

Sorry, don't mean to sound like a 10 year old, but you gotta admit the naming convention is quite funny ;)
Why so few posts? (Score:1)

by Paul Bain ( 9907 ) writes:

&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp I am amazed at the paucity of posts relating to this story. I thought that there were many thousands of Debian users on Slashdot. And I thought that nearly everyone would have an opinion on why Woody was delayed so. Am I wrong?
- Re:Why so few posts? (Score:1)
  
  by HP LoveJet ( 8592 ) writes:
  
  I think it's because this is a Red-Headed Stepchild story that got posted to dev.s.o but never made it to the front page.
- Re:Why so few posts? (Score:1)
  
  by MessageDrivenBean ( 534518 ) writes:
  
  It doesn't really matter, since you could have been running Woody from the day Potato was freezed anyway. I have.

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

A Debriefing On Debian's Woody Release 17

A Debriefing On Debian's Woody Release More Login

A Debriefing On Debian's Woody Release

Must.... release.... faster..... (Score:1)

Comments about boot floppies are now obsolete (Score:2, Interesting)

boot floppy reinvention.. yet again? (Score:2)

DVD Version of Woody (Score:3, Funny)

Hehe... woody... release.... (Score:1)

Why so few posts? (Score:1)

Re:Why so few posts? (Score:1)

Re:Why so few posts? (Score:1)

Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.

Slashdot Top Deals

Slashdot