Knoppix Variant Offers Full NTFS Write Support 100
mache writes "Full NTFS write support for Knoppix is under discussion on Knoppix Ideas forum and it looks that Knopper will include Captive into Knoppix 3.4. The best part of Live CD with full NTFS write support is that it actually exists in LinuxDefender, a remastered Knoppix distribution made by Bitdefender, presented at LinuxConf 2003, the annual Romanian Linux Users Group (RLUG) conference."
what I still don't understand sbout Knoppix... (Score:3, Interesting)
Anyone has internal information on how Knoppix is developed and maintained?
Re:what I still don't understand sbout Knoppix... (Score:2)
Re:what I still don't understand sbout Knoppix... (Score:1)
> other, "commercial" Linux distros?
I've found the hardware detection in Knoppix to be almost exactly on par with
Mandrake -- what works with one works with the other. As far as "better
features", the main feature I like in Knoppix is the ability to boot from
CD-ROM
other distros?
Re:what I still don't understand sbout Knoppix... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:what I still don't understand sbout Knoppix... (Score:2)
Re:what I still don't understand sbout Knoppix... (Score:1)
That being said, the biggest advantage of Knoppix, imho anyway, isn't that it's GPL, but that I can boot it off the CD, making it a very useful tool when trying to revive dead machines.
Re:what I still don't understand sbout Knoppix... (Score:2)
Re:what I still don't understand sbout Knoppix... (Score:1)
what about linux 2.6 (Score:2)
Nope (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Nope (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Nope (Score:2)
Re:Nope (Score:2)
Re:Nope (Score:1)
Re:Nope (Score:1)
Re:Nope (Score:3, Interesting)
How well does NTFS read-only work?
Does it support > 2GB NTFS files on x86 machines?
If it does stuff like that reliably then I might consider using it for certain sort of backups. In many cases I won't be too bothered about permissions and the other stuff.
Re:Nope (Score:3, Insightful)
Debian reads all three fine.
Windows reads all three fine.
Re:Nope (Score:1)
Re:Nope (Score:2)
Re:Nope (Score:2)
Not native windows, but decently fast. My only problem is 1) need to 'net start ext2fsd' on boot (I'm sure there is probably a way to automate it, but I'm no windows admin). 2) Winamp5 seems to list my songs double when using the jump feature.
Its fast enough that I can watch high quality por^H^H^Hmovies off of it without lag or excess system load.
Re:Nope (Score:2)
What I'm saying is, I doubt it's very hard to automate -- a couple minutes of googling (that I haven't bothered with) would probably do it. Any of us who have to use Windows (at work or otherwise), may as well make it work (as much as possible) the way we want...
Re:Nope (Score:1)
Which of course it would be. If the file wasn't there, what use would NTFS read or write be on the system anyway?
Re:what about linux 2.6 (Score:2, Insightful)
The new driver, introduced in 2.5.11, has some write code, but it's very limited. The driver can overwrite existing files, but it cannot change the length, add new or delete existing files.
http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/info/ntfs.html#3 .2 [sourceforge.net]
Legality? (Score:5, Insightful)
Seems to me like that would or will violate the Microsoft EULA and leave Knoppix users open to problems if MS changes parts of these DLLs in subsequent service packs or releases.
Re:Legality? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Legality? (Score:2)
Seems like a bad idea to me.
Re:Legality? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Legality? (Score:2)
not saying i don't totally agree with you; i'm just playing devil's advocate.
Re:Legality? (Score:2)
Re:Legality? (Score:2)
am i US-centric? yes. that's where i live, that's where
Re:Legality? (Score:2)
Re:Legality? (Score:2, Funny)
Enforceable or not, who has the resources to go toe to tow with MS legal.
IBM.
What do I win?
Re:Legality? (Score:1)
Re:Legality? (Score:3, Informative)
Depends on how they try to put it (Score:2)
Then again, it could be a grey area... it's like the "am I allowed to mod my XBox, am I allowed to help other people mod theirs to use it for what the want" issue.
It is legal (Score:1)
Re:It is legal (Score:3, Interesting)
However the EULA also states that any use of the software not expressly granted to the end user is reserved by Microsoft. This way Microsoft can say OK for friends and NO for competitors. Did you already forget when Microsoft threatened MS Visual FoxPro users some months ago who used the same trick?
Ditch Microsoft then no such troubles.
Re:I'll rather wait for the full oo support (Score:2)
Re:I'll rather wait for the full oo support (Score:2)
NTFS is not an encrypted file system. Windows' layered file system architecture supports encryption, yes, but that's not quite the same thing.
Re:I'll rather wait for the full oo support (Score:2)
M$ really needs to get their act up.
Re:I'll rather wait for the full oo support (Score:2)
Remember Microsoft is a Corperation of the USA...linux hackers are just Citizens [or maybe even Foriegn citizens...the horror]
Re:I'll rather wait for the full oo support (Score:1)
Breaking NTFS is part of the technology evolution. ext3 "broke" ext2, reiser4 "broke" reiserfs, etc. So why you can't mess your filesystem? Because everytime these changes happen the on-disk filesystem version, signatures are also incremented. Not doing so Microsoft would damage itself, for example by W2K, XP destroying Longhorn NTFS. If this version change is detected then no data harm is possible. The old, unmaintai
Re:I'll rather wait for the full oo support (Score:2)
Re:I'll rather wait for the full oo support (Score:2, Informative)
> with ntfs, i'd rather wait until the kernel supports it fully (there's
> allready a "partial" driver in the kernel 2.6). But personally, i just
> stick to FAT32.
The usefulness of this is primarily geared toward situations where NTFS is
already extant (e.g., OEM installs of WinXP). In these scenerios, if you
want to multiboot and share data between the two OSes, use Knoppix as a
rescue system, or anything along those lines, y
Re:I'll rather wait for the full oo support (Score:1)
ntfs also supports bigger file sizes and better performance for bigger partitions along with fact that its a journaling file system like ext3 and reiser.
Re:I'll rather wait for the full oo support (Score:1)
This would only matter for situations with multiple users who don't trust one
another, which basically either means servers (where if you're using Windows
I feel sorry for you) or some kind of unusual desktop situation. I've seen
many, many Windows desktops, but they were all either used by one person or
were used by multiple people who all shared the same user account. I've not
yet seen anyone actually using the Windows multiu
Re:I'll rather wait for the full oo support (Score:3, Informative)
You do video editing, XP has some good tools, Linux has some good tools. Video editing is best done on a file system that can handle large files like EXT2/3, Reiser, or NTFS (FAT 32 has a 4GB maximum file size)
Since XP doesn't support any of the Linux filesystems in read/write mode (at full speed) even with opensource add-on drivers there are 2 options for a video editor who wants to use both paltforms.
#1 buy 2 computers and network them and pass the
Excuse me? (Score:2)
I mean, realistically, wouldn't the best part of full read/write NTFS support be the fact that it exists?
Re:Excuse me? (Score:2)
Re:Excuse me? (Score:1)
Just my 2 euro-cents.
Re:Using microsoft programs in Captive. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Using microsoft programs in Captive. (Score:4, Interesting)
The flaw in your argument: use of "obviously" and "should" instead of giving a reason why Microsoft would allow this. (Allow? Yes. Until their EULA is declared illegal or void, it's a legally binding agreement with MS software users - even when it's stupid.)
Re:Using microsoft programs in Captive. (Score:5, Informative)
> Wondering if there are legal problems with this.
One supposes that if you have an NTFS partition with these files on it, the
files are licensed for you to use and therefore legal. (If not, you have a
problem that goes beyond captive-ntfs.) Unless there is some specific
verbiage in the EULA that expressly prohibits use of the drivers when the
NT kernel isn't running, or some such restriction, I'm not sure what the
legal problem would be. I find it difficult to imagine that the MS legal
team would have dreamed up that kind of restriction, since it's not the sort
of thing they would expect people to do. What happens when the EULA is
revised is another matter, but this would have to get on the MS radar for
that to happen, which will take at least a year, then another six months or
so until the next update/revision cycle, and hopefully by then the native
read/write NTFS support in the 2.6 kernel will be of such quality as to make
the whole point moot.
Re:Using microsoft programs in Captive. (Score:1)
It's also fine if you just wan
Re:Using microsoft programs in Captive. (Score:2, Informative)
> kernel's NTFS support is its capabilities, not its quality.
Capabilities aren't part of quality? Do you want a car that can't make right
turns? What about a car that can't make turns at all -- it would still be
fine for driving straight ahead, and you could even put it in reverse...
> It can only write to a file without increasing its size - and no creating
> or deleting files or directories.
This limits its usefulness in imp
Re:Using microsoft programs in Captive. (Score:4, Informative)
They are. But NTFS is a huge project. It takes a lot of time [sourceforge.net]. Today it's developed as a hobby, couple of hours a week or not even that much.
> I would really like to think that in a few months
> someone will figure out how to (safely) lift these restrictions
The developers said in the forums: somebody having lots of time must start active coding (no need for reverse engineering [sourceforge.net] any more) or hire coders and finance the development.
Re:Using microsoft programs in Captive. (Score:2)
I b
Re:Using microsoft programs in Captive. (Score:3, Informative)
I don't mean this a troll, but when has M$ ever cared about stabbing a "friend" in the back? They do it every time it becomes convenient. I remember a cellphone company story a while back who partnered with M$ and a last I heard, we suing for stealing technology as just one example.
Re:Using microsoft programs in Captive. (Score:1)
> at least, UNLESS they licensed the driver themselves, somehow.
They probably already do, but if not it would be trivial for Microsoft to
arrange agreements with each of them.
Re:Using microsoft programs in Captive. (Score:2)
Or M$ just uses the next service pack/patch to revise the EULA.
Re:Using microsoft programs in Captive. (Score:1)
That would still take 2-3 months. And that's *after* captive-ntfs gets on the
Microsoft radar, which is six months *after* it's widely deployed, which is
six months from today. So we're still talking fifteen months -- enough time,
in theory, for someone to code the desired capabilities into the native NTFS
driver. (One of the big distros should probably pay someone to do this, though,
as it hasn't happened up till now. Probably because most
The New Old Thing (Score:2, Informative)
Raymond Chen will be pissed.
Torrent? (Score:2)
Could a kind soul who has already gotten it please make a torrent out of it? Thanks!
Re:Torrent? (Score:1)
Re:Torrent? (Score:1)
Re:Torrent? (Score:2)
One thing I wonder (Score:1)
Since now NTFS.SYS is working under Linux although through emulation it should be quite easy to spy to what it's doing, and try to improve the native driver based on that.
Re:One thing I wonder (Score:1)
Re:One thing I wonder (Score:3, Informative)
Linux "Switcher" CD's (Score:4, Interesting)
This would be the logical extension to Bruce Perens' UserLinux idea.
Re:Linux "Switcher" CD's (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Linux "Switcher" CD's (Score:1)
Re:Linux "Switcher" CD's (Score:1)
Re:Linux "Switcher" CD's (Score:2)
Re:Linux "Switcher" CD's (Score:2)
Re:Linux "Switcher" CD's (Score:2)
Re:Linux "Switcher" CD's (Score:2)
Re:Linux "Switcher" CD's (Score:2)
Re:Linux "Switcher" CD's (Score:2)
I did a little reading on the UserLinux site, and I don't have much argument at all with what Mr. Perens has to say, nor how he says it. Okay, now I guess
Re:Linux "Switcher" CD's (Score:2)
It's actually prett
Try QTparted (Score:1)
pagefile (Score:5, Insightful)
Now that there is reliable NTFS write support, maybe we could get a kernel modification to use the pagefile.sys as a swap partition.
mkswap
swapon
What about using the windows temp directory for storage of highly used apps and libs?
-metric
Re:pagefile (Score:2, Informative)
The commands, you wrote, should work with either driver without any kernel modification but Captive NTFS is much slower.
Re:pagefile (Score:1)
Re:pagefile (Score:2, Informative)