Default AmigaOS4 Icon Set Revealed 45
Mike Bouma writes "A new screenshot showing OS4's default icon set by Martin 'Mason' Merz has been revealed. Also Q&A session 27 with Amiga's CTO Fleecy Moss is now available. Hyperion, Eyetech, AmigaWorld.net and many more exhibitors will attend the upcoming AmiGBG fair in Sweden." I also like the fantasy Amiga linked to from the Q&A session.
Wee! (Score:5, Funny)
A small handful of people rejoice!!
Re:Wee! (Score:2)
Because there is still an active user and developer user community. Many of these people prefer the way AmigaOS handled things, such as its transparency, responsiveness and flexibility of the system.
Alot of time and effort is being spend on the project both by fulltime commercial and enthusiastic parttime developers and designers.
AmigaOS3.9 was r
BSD IS....oh wait a minute (Score:5, Funny)
That's nice, but... (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not making fun of anyone here, and I seriously would like to know; I've always been hearing about Amiga this and Amiga that here on Slashdot every once in a while, and doing a little sniffing around on the web there appears to be a pretty active Amiga community. Also, they're still developing the operating system, so there still must be Amigas, right? Right?
Well, that's what I was hoping, but after doing some heavy searching on google I haven't been able to turn up a single machine. All of the suspect web sites like Amiga's corporate site and other places don't give any information other than "Contact your local Amiga dealer." Great. Where am I supposed to find one of those? After a little searching about that, nothing good really came up. Most of the sites I found either a) didn't exist anymore or b) didn't really have any Amiga stuff.
Okay, maybe I am just looking in all of the wrong places, but if somebody could point me out to some good resources then that would be great; I always love to try different and unusual systems, and I'm really interested in this AmigaOS. I just don't have anything to run it on.
Re:That's nice, but... (Score:5, Informative)
Pretty easy to find... (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.forefronttechnologiesinc.com/Product
$1200 for an 800mhz G4 Amiga system.
Re:Pretty easy to find... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Pretty easy to find... (Score:4, Funny)
Here [emulation.net]
Re:Pretty easy to find... (Score:1)
Re:Pretty easy to find... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Pretty easy to find... (Score:1)
Re:That's nice, but... (Score:4, Informative)
RE: (Score:3, Funny)
Pretty awful. (Score:5, Insightful)
The problem is that the look and feel of this new Amiga desktop is still based on pixel-by-pixel hand-made artwork. At higher resolutions it leaves the images looking very busy because of the detailed work that lacks anti-aliasing - yet also very bland because of the limited use of color.
The solution (as chosen by the designers of Windows XP, MacOS and others) - is to use vector artwork as the source. Scalable graphics formats can be rendered to images of any size. No icon should be terribly complicated - but when it's rendered to a small image, vector images gain automatic sub-pixel anti-aliasing and resizing of their smooth color gradients. Both of which are too complicated to do efficiently by hand when working pixel-by-pixel - but they make the final on-screen result look infinitely better.
Re:Pretty awful. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Pretty awful. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Pretty awful. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Pretty awful. (Score:2)
Too little too late. (Score:5, Insightful)
That day is past: looking at this desktop I see nothing that different from any other desktop. My love for the Amiga was its ability to crank tracker sound files while doing work. The ability to play games far cooler than any the PC world could generate. The ability to multitask while compiling software.
Today, even a modest PC with XP home can do all that and more. I'm really not seeing the value that "Amiga" brings to the table. Sure, it brings back memories, but I'm more apt to fire up my emulator to revist some classics than to want a new OS that runs on... what?
Re:Too little too late. (Score:3, Insightful)
One could make the same point to every Mac and Linux (along with everything else) article.
Yes, Windows can do what the Amiga did ten years ago, and more (I would hope so!) but I guess some people still prefer alternatives to Windows. There's more to a computer than custom hardware and a quick look at a static screenshot (and even if there wasn't, that wouldn't make Windows automatically better by default!)
No Alpha Transparency? (Score:2, Insightful)
First you get the Icons. (Score:4, Funny)
Then you get the vaporware of the year award.
The Amiga underdog... (Score:2, Interesting)
-Bob
GrimReaper (Score:2)
Woo hoo! (Score:2)
So, where do I download the Nautilus tarball for my Linux machine?
From the "..and noone cared" department. (Score:1, Troll)
The assumption of Amiga OS team living in a cave for la
Re:From the "..and noone cared" department. (Score:2)
hell, they might even consider open-sourcing it, although, again, not may would care
I'm sure those involved with AROS or MorphOS would care.
If you don't care, why do you bother reading and posting to articles about it? Unless perhaps you're the teenager with too much time on your hand, of course.
Re:From the "..and noone cared" department. (Score:1)
That's just fine. My point is, AROS, MorphOS, or AnyOtherSuperCoolOS are just as irrelevant as AmigaOS or CPM are. The big OS competition on PC platform is down to Windows vs Linux and the cost of entry for any other OS is unbearably high. Plan 9 and BeOS were very promising candidates but they failed just as quickly.
Both Linux and Windows are extremely feature-complete at this point. I am yet to see a compelling argument for any other "different" O
Re:From the "..and noone cared" department. (Score:2)
My point is, AROS, MorphOS, or AnyOtherSuperCoolOS are just as irrelevant as AmigaOS or CPM are.
Slashdot carries articles on all sorts of OSs (eg, AtheOS), and I'm sure that including ones that are far less used than AmigaOS or BeOS. I don't see these articles filled with "no one cares" type comments.
Both Linux and Windows are extremely feature-complete at this point. I am yet to see a compelling argument for any other "different" OS on Intel hardware (I am not counting BSD which roughly falls into t
Re:From the "..and noone cared" department. (Score:1)
I guess Slashdot should stop covering anything other than Windows or Linux, since no one cares. Or come to that, why bother with Linux? Might as well go Windows-only. No, both would be an oversimplification of what
Art for Art's Sake (Score:2)
Can't wait (Score:2)
*shiver*
ASL? (Score:2)
Pre-release (SDK CD) AmigaOS4 icons (Score:4, Informative)
The AmigaOS4 Pre-Release/SDK will be available to all AmigaOne owners and is currently undergoing final beta-testing.
Amiga Features (Score:3, Interesting)
They're very 90s "newicons" amigaish, which is a look I always personally disliked, but they were undeniably friendly for beginners and people who just wanted to get stuff done and wanted recognisable icons instead of fashion statements.
I'm more interested in the window borders - simple, clean, still distinctively amigaish.
But what really struck me was all the stuff that I'd semi-forgotten about from the Amiga, that the amiga just plain did better than "modern" OSes. Look at the Devs window. Want to install a device driver? Put it in the Devs folder, and that's assuming you've got such crappy hardware that failed to include an amiga autoconfig rom with a built-in driver. Want to install a library? Libs folder. Want to read a new kind of multimedia data type? Get a DataType for it, put it in DataTypes folder, and even programs written before the invention of the data type have a fair chance of being able to handle it.
I think it was the logical volumes ("assigns") that allowed the amiga to have a non-sucky system and application file/directory structure.
Memories... (Score:1)