The New Secret Sauce For E-Commerce 22
prostoalex writes "The hottest e-commerce trend this year? APIs and opening up databases to outside developers, says Information Week. There are currently 50,000 software developers in Amazon.com Web Services program, while eBay enjoys the presence of 8,000 companies and individual developers in its API program. There are 30 million XML queries performed on eBay servers daily."
in other words... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:in other words... (Score:3, Insightful)
Yup (Score:5, Insightful)
Auction Snipers? (Score:4, Insightful)
There also are risks to opening the technology vault. EBay has to contend with a legion of "auction snipers," Web sites that automatically enter preset bids during the waning seconds of auctions.
Is this really much of a problem? Ebay itself has functionality that allows users to enter the maximum that they're willing to pay, and it auto-increments their bid based on this. Also, even if bid-sniping was a major issue, there have been scripts around for a long time that do this.
Re:Auction Snipers? (Score:5, Insightful)
A perfectly rational buyer is going to enter a maximum bid amount based on what he or she thinks the item is worth and then be done with it. But, buyers are seldom "perfectly rational." Once someone bids on an item, the bidder forms an attachment to it -- when outbid, there's a competition with the other bidders. Bidders rationalize raising their previous "maximum price", because they really want the item, and "maybe it's worth more than I thought."
This irrational behavior benefits the seller, because irrational people bidding more on an item than it's worth are a great way for a seller to make more money. This, in turn, benefits eBay because the sellers are happier.
Conversely, the auction snipers benefit the buyers. The temptation to bid "just a little more" is removed. The reward system geared to unhealthy addictive behavior is gone. The bidder decides on a maximum rational amount, puts in a bid, and either gets the item or doesn't. It's perfect. Paradoxically, though, this makes the bidder unhappy. Bidders feel cheated, because they waited all the way to the end of an auction, feel soooo close to getting thier dream item, start to form an attachment, and the item is snatched away by a "sniper." Never mind that the sniper just paid more than the bidder thought the item was worth -- the bidder feels cheated, because he lost the opportunity to behave irrationally.
Bid sniping makes both bidders and sellers unhappy. It costs the sellers money, and it cuts out the addictive feedback the bidder has grown to depend on.
Re:Auction Snipers? (Score:2, Interesting)
I think you're right. On a side note, it's fascinated me to watch the drama surrounding some of the Greek pins on Ebay. Some members got very concerned about "rescuing" their organization's pins
Re:Auction Snipers? (Score:3, Interesting)
Also, when I do a "normal" bid, I put in not my maximum for a product, but a fiar price. Which is frequently lower than my max
Re:Auction Snipers? (Score:1)
There probably are situations where this works.
Also, when I do a "normal" bid, I put in not my maximum for a product, but a fiar price. Which is frequently lower than my maximum.
I don't understand this. If you're willing to raise your bid to a certain maximum, why not just put that bid in as your maximum bid and be done with it? I don't understand what advantage you get by starting at a price lower than y
Re:Auction Snipers? (Score:2)
Also, sellers have friends. For example, my sister had an auction up. Someone bid 70 bucks. She asked me to bid 80, so she got more. I bid, the other guy ended up paying 81. But I
Re:Auction Snipers? Loser's curse (Score:1)
Salespeople become obsolete? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Biz-Talk. (Score:4, Insightful)
Isn't this the way B2B and B2C works with things like WSDL, EDI, and web services?
In technological terms, yes. However, most typical B2B arrangements are far from open - management meet and hammer out a contract, tech meet and hammer out interfaces and connectivity, etc. Even if the arrangement is only one company providing data to another, there is considerable interaction between both organizatons before exchanging data with one party paying the other for data. In all cases, the two parties only interact by agreement - usually in the form of a specially arranged contract.
EBay and Amazon allow nearly anyone to connect to their services, Anyone can retrieve that data for free and use it to make themselves (as well as Amazon and Ebay) money. While there is a contractual arrangement between Amazon or EBay and the partner, it's generally a boilerplate contract that simply allows Amazon and EBay to prevent abuse.
The advantage for EBay and Amazon is that they don't have to come up with interesting uses for their data - they simply encourage partners' ideas and both parties make money.
50,000 Amazon developers? Right. (Score:2)
Re:50,000 Amazon developers? Right. (Score:1)
It's a pretty low overhead way to get their products sold through a major, trusted source. And 50,000 wouldn't surprise me.
Kickbacks? Does it work? (Score:1)