Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Video Learn About the FRDCSA 'Weak AI' Project (Video) 52

Today's interviewee, Andrew Dougherty, has a Web page that says he is " autodidact mathematician and computer scientist specializing in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Algorithmic Information Theory (AIT). He is the founder of the FRDCSA (Formalized Research Database: Cluster Study & Apply) project, a practical attempt at weak AI aimed primarily at collecting and interrelating existing software with theoretical motivation from AIT. He has made over 90 open source applications, 400 (unofficial) Debian GNU/Linux packages and 800 Perl5 modules (see" Tim Lord says Andrew's project "brings together a lot of AI algorithms, collects large sets of data for those algorithms to chew on, and writes software to do things like ... guide your whole life." As you might guess, Andrew occupies a pretty far edge of the eccentric programmer world, as you'll see from this video (and transcript). He calls himself "a serious Stallmanite" (his word), and has chosen the GPL for his software in the hopes that it will therefore help the greatest number of people. (Speaking of help, he's looking for interesting data sets and various "life rules" that can be integrated with his planning software, and one of the reasons he presented at the recent YAPC::NA was to solicit help in putting his hundreds of Perl modules onto CPAN.)

Tim: At this year’s YAPC::NA that is Yet Another Perl Conference: North America, I met with Andrew Dougherty. Andrew has been working for the last 14 years on a wide ranging artificial intelligence system called FRDCSA. Unlike systems like Apple Siri or IBM’s Watson his is based entirely on free software and has an interesting philosophical motivation. Let’s hear what he has to say. You are wearing a pair of headphones you got them on your neck, what are they for, what do they have to do with your project?

Andrew: Well, so I have a system which allows voice control of your computer, your free software AI, and it is not a terribly advanced system, but it is something that gives you a voice interface to your computer, and it is the start of something especially when you can do processing of the verbal commands, right now it is just using regular expressions that parse out the commands.

Tim: The headphones you are wearing, is that a two-way, do you have a mike that goes back, or is that right now just offering audio prompt?

Andrew: This is a Bluetooth that goes to my cell phone. And so the media button, when the software is installed and the web service is on my server at home, which runs the FRDCSA, are running, then the media button activates the voice prompt which says yes, and then you just say what you need it do, it helps you out, you can ask it a question, an actual question, it uses ____1:28 to render the answer.

Tim: Can you just explain the software that this project encompasses a little bit?You have collected a lot of data and you’ve also collected pieces of AI software to deal with the data that you’ve collected. Can we talk about the data first? What sort of datasets? What kind of

Andrew: Well researchers are fabulous at releasing all kinds of data sets, and I have a system which is spidering the web looking for these datasets, and using text classification to recognize that it is a researcher’s page. There are other people who have done this, I am just repeating what they have done, and fetching as many datasets and metadata, trying to use ____2:12 to register the semantic data about the files.

Tim: What are some examples of datasets that you’ve collected?

Andrew: I can’t think of anything offhand. The problem is some of the data was lost with a hard drive failure, so a lot of the data portion was lost but the code thankfully is all intact, and it will just be a matter of rebooting.

Tim: Let’s talk about the code itself a little bit? What are some examples of what the code can do if you have structured data that it has access to? You have a collection of, sort of collected knowledge, what are some things that the software itself is capable of?

Andrew: Well, I will just use a couple of examples. One of my favorite systems is the Kinect system. And what that does is extract from text subintentional information about the text, so if you say, “Wendy got in the car,” it will say, “A female can get in a car”. And it abstracts to tell you what is possible and so forth. And this is really useful for building ontologies. So that’s one example. I didn’t really explain it well, but just look up Kinect. It is one of my favorite systems. I am using that to bootstrap the rules of the Free Life Planner.

Tim: Now the Free Life Planner, can you talk about that a little bit? What is it?

Andrew: Well, I think everyone, myself especially, can use a little assistance in trying to figure out how to plan in their daily lives, long term goals, what it is to lead a good life, and the life planner uses crowdsourcing to apply rules. Right now, all the rules are in books, and you can’t really you’d have to read all the books first to access the rules. And most people have read only a smattering of all the books that are out there, if you can compile all the rules into an executable format and run that on your computer, then you are a lot of the way there; obviously, the rules will conflict so you use trust mechanisms to determine which set of rules you believe in and so on. And there is also a systemic reasoning to try to arrive at beliefs. So all this is based on philosophy that I have read off of Wikipedia and so on.

Tim: That is a very ambitious goal.

Andrew: Thanks yeah.

Tim: Most software does things like you type a shopping list, this is something that is much more abstract and philosophical.

Andrew: It seems that it is easier to solve everything rather than to break it down and try to solve individual problems.

Tim: Interesting. There has been a lot of interest lately in AI and things like IBM’s Watson and the question answering software on Android and Siri on iOS. So yours is different in a few ways from that, and I want to ask you about some of the ways it is different. What is your motivation? You just touched on it somewhat with the Life Planner. Is that the same goal of improving life? Is that basically what you would describe the entire project is about?

Andrew: When I was a kid my sister died. And it was a very hard experience for everyone. It kind of broke our family. And I was just left with the impression that if something could have been done to delay that, that the world might be a better place. You know, it is counterfactual reasoning what would’ve happened had she lived, but I’d like to think that she would have touched a lot of lives, and so I just wanted to prevent bad things from happening to people, and I am not sure that I have an answer to that, but I am using the best techniques that I can find.

Tim: Can you give an example of ways that let’s say a danger could be prevented?

Andrew: Okay, I will give you an example that I use. I saw a video on the internet of a kid who walked in front of a train by accident, and with smart phones and communication systems, it should be possible to prevent that. There is also a system called Poseidon (I think that’s what it is called)a French company built it, and it watches underneath pools for drowning people. And if you are drowning, that is a very important system for someone to have built.

Tim: Sure. So there have to be a lot of hooks between things like sensor data, or crowdsourced observations that can help actually activate a warning or a response.

Andrew: And inference is generally the mechanism that I choose to use. I think the military has done great work in this area. I am a pacifist myself but if we can apply that technology to civilian life, and they are, because Siri uses, I think it uses Spark which is developed at SRI, so I am just trying to facilitate the conglomeration of free software so that these services can get into the hands of people. You do run into some issues when you empower people, because they might misuse that power. So I don’t pretend to have any political answers. And that is something that I want to study.

Tim: You mentioned that it is free software. That sounds like an important aspect to you of the entire project. Can you talk about the life?

Andrew: Yeah, I am a fan of Richard Stallman. He expresses things in simple terms, and I might just be caught in the glister of it all, you know, is it really free software? But I think that because the software is mutable for people and because it is a non rivalrous good so you can copy it endlessly. It seems like it is a closed system whatever you put in terms of functionality on the development end winds up immediately in the hands of users, and that can assist them and hopefully prevent bad things from happening.

Tim: Specifically are you releasing under one of the GPL versions or some other free software license?

Andrew: Yeah, I haven’t put too much thought into it. I am going with GPL version 3. Like I say, everything that Stallman has said rings true with me, but more sophisticated analysis of licenses would be welcome.

Tim: Now how long have you been working on this project?

Andrew: I have been working on this project for 14 years. That is right after I met the lady who I had mentioned. And I was very motivated to work on it, and I just developed the software as a result of that motivation.

Tim: Is it written in a modular style, where you got lots of small programs, or is the entire thing a sort of a monolith?

Andrew: Well it is in a way a monolith, it is modular there are a lot of dependencies between modules, and I am writing software to refactor some of that out, but right now it is kind of a monolithic project.

Tim: Is Perl your primary development language?

Andrew: Absolutely.

Tim: Or are there other languages involved as well?

Andrew: I wrap other languages but my development is in Perl.

Tim: So when you are wrapping other languages, is that mostly taking existing AI tools?

Andrew: Well, Perl has nifty things like the Expect library which allow you to wrap a screen like a terminal. And you can just execute terminal code and scrape it and parse it out. And so I wrap a couple of systems that way. And then there is also just running command line parsing parameters to the command line. And I am sure other languages do that as well, of course, but I just prefer to do things in Perl. Perl has the great application of CPAN.

Tim: In fact, I saw you talk here at the conference about Packaging CPAN. Talk about that a little bit. What do you need to have done to put the software that you’ve written into the CPAN repository?

Andrew: Oh okay, there are two directions. There is getting my software into CPAN and there’s packaging CPAN and Debian RedHat and RPM and Deb based formats and also for Microsoft formats. So packaging the software I have written for CPAN is there is a guy by the name Duke Leto, or Lito I am not exactly sure, but he is showing me how to do it. And it is something that has proven very hard for me over the years, to actually do this and he is walking me through it. And that little bit of help is much appreciated. That lot bit of help.

Tim: In the end ideally then with the sort of packaging you are talking about, so people will be able to simply say, apt get install Life Helper.

Andrew: Yeah. And it should be standard.

Tim: And when that’s true, when that’s easy for the ordinary person to have on their like you say, even if you are using Windows or other OSes what one thing is the idea? What do you want to see happen with this?

Andrew: Well, so there are different philosophical theories, and the one that I am familiar with eudaimonia and that is just a description of everyone living well. And I think that there are ways to improve, I don’t know that you can create a Utopia but it would be nice to have some kind of future where everyone’s hopes and dreams are realized.

Tim: Let me ask you one more question.

Andrew: My friend Justin Coslor says there are positive possibilities at every point in time for everyone. So he has got a book Possibilities and I recommend it. Sorry to interrupt.

Tim: No, no. If people want to join in, and contribute in some way, are there other ways for them to somehow add to your project.

Andrew: There will be ways to contribute but right now the best thing to do is just drop me an email with the subject of FRDCSA to me at It is not a dotcom, it is a dot org.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Learn About the FRDCSA 'Weak AI' Project (Video)

Comments Filter:
  • by gl4ss ( 559668 ) on Thursday June 13, 2013 @12:57PM (#43997705) Homepage Journal

    did the weak ai write the summary and the perl packages?

    • by tgd ( 2822 )

      did the weak ai write the summary and the perl packages?

      It's still superior to the "slashdot_editors" package.

  • Weak Al (Score:5, Funny)

    by Chris Mattern ( 191822 ) on Thursday June 13, 2013 @01:02PM (#43997755)

    Weird Al's lesser known brother!

  • by OverlordQ ( 264228 ) on Thursday June 13, 2013 @01:10PM (#43997859) Journal

    So he can write hundreds of Perl Modules, but not a single script that can automate the upload process?

    • by atom1c ( 2868995 )

      Apparently he doesn't know how to configure an Apache's DocumentRoot, either (see [])

    • by The Cat ( 19816 ) *

      You're so fucking cool. I wish I was just like you and could find the flaws in everyone else. You must be a right fucking howl at parties, huh? Do you go around insulting all the cute girls at the parties too?

      Write a book, man. There are a lot of people in the world who want to be bigger dicks.

  • by antifoidulus ( 807088 ) on Thursday June 13, 2013 @01:19PM (#43997949) Homepage Journal
    Ok so maybe his past couple albums weren't the best, but he is still as "weird" as ever... What's that, oh weak "AI(as in artificial intelligence"), sorry /. Mobile's shitty font got me confused there for a second.
  • by schlameel ( 1017070 ) on Thursday June 13, 2013 @01:49PM (#43998187)
    Any respectable AI would suggest a better name.
  • Am I the only Doctor Who fan that did a double take on that name?

  • Roblimo has posted a story that I almost care about.

    I don't mean to wale on the guy, but after over a decade, I get kinda tired of One Single Person who continually annoys me on Slashdot. And... somehow, I don't think I'm alone.


  • In English? Please? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by X0563511 ( 793323 ) on Thursday June 13, 2013 @02:30PM (#43998739) Homepage Journal

    ... a practical attempt at weak AI aimed primarily at collecting and interrelating existing software with theoretical motivation from AIT

    <stares blankly>

  • He calls himself "a serious Stallmanite" (his word), and has chosen the GPL for his software in the hopes that it will therefore help the greatest number of people.

    Then he's a fool. All things being equal, a non-copyleft license will always benefit more people than a GPL license, because more people can use it. Don't get me wrong, I agree with copyleft, but the only justification is reciprocity (my work's free, so yours must be too). If that's not your justification, GPL is the wrong license for you.

  • by Anonymous Coward
    It should be done in Go or at least Ruby to get today's kids on board. This is doomed.
  • Confusingly, the web site [] is full of broken links. And how hard is it to sign up for a PAUSE id and upload modules to CPAN? About the only difficult part of that is picking namespaces for the 800 modules that he's written.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      This details some of the difficulties in releasing it.

  • by NoImNotNineVolt ( 832851 ) on Thursday June 13, 2013 @04:50PM (#44000713) Homepage
    A fascinating interview, a fascinating person, a fascinating project.
    And this is all we can muster? A few jokes about Weird Al, complaints about not putting his modules up on CPAN...
    And not a single person is interested in an open source AI project that seeks to build up a comprehensive ontology from the crap scattered across the web?
    The deafening silence in the comments is hurting my head. It's like all the nerds left, and we're now left with a SlashBI crowd.

    The least we could do is imagine a beowulf cluster of these, shit.
    • I too was hoping for something more substantial, like a discussion on the merits of his approach to A.I., etc.

      • by oh2 ( 520684 )
        Considering the state of the AI art, any attempt at improving it is a step forward.
        • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

          by Anonymous Coward
          Part of the reason state of the AI art is where it is now is because there is so much work on it that hasn't gone anywhere. So I don't think any attempt at improving it is a step forward, as the field has already demonstrated that there is a lot of attempts that were not a step forward. I'm not trying to say the field is static, just it will take some combination of luck and insight/vision for further contributions to actually go anywhere.
      • I too was hoping for something more substantial, like a discussion on the merits of his approach to A.I., etc.

        How could we? The interview was without any real substance. I was hoping for something juicy (I've working on some funky NLG-based applications at the moment) but the interview gave no insight into what he's actually doing, and didn't motivate me to look any further.

        I like the idea that someone's working on integrating existing command-line apps in novel ways — I wish more people would design their software for an old-school Unix pipes-and-redirects architecture, so that we could play computer Lego i

    • by gl4ss ( 559668 )

      the content is a video.
      the content doesn't have that much content.
      there isn't much to discuss if anything.

      so yeah, this is all we can muster. and for the record I think crowdsourcing life planning is .. well, stupid. stupid and boring. I need a computer to tell me what other people think that I should do as much as I need a heart attack or to hear about how some packages need lobbying/work to push into cpan.

      did YOU watch the whole video? what did it give to you? did you miss the part where he lost the data?

    • I think a life planning ai is a great idea, I've often wished I had one. 1. everyone is mentally in a different place (world view) and has different abilities / talents / handicaps. 2. the sum total of man's knowledge and experience is impossible for any one person to absorb. 3. an ai that could parse through it all and make useful suggestions sounds great. My vision is of a clever answer at every turn, but reality would probably be more boring. Like "recycle more".
  • Has this guy actually contributed anything new, or is he just finding stuff he thinks is cool and cobbling it together? FWIW, I've been unable to find even a single paper with his name on it.
  • by Krishnoid ( 984597 ) * on Thursday June 13, 2013 @06:30PM (#44001763) Journal
    One thing that struck me was the time and effort he put into it. He's been working on it for many years now, which is probably why he's been able to write 800 modules for the project.
    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Hi Krishna!

      The closest thing I have to a paper is this:

      Although the data was lost, there is a substantial amount of projects of the data (i.e. metadata) such as file listings, software names, and so on. Also earlier versions exist. So a lot of it can be reconstructed. Also the disk containing the data could still be recovered. But the code which fetches and manipulates the data is in tact.

"Hey Ivan, check your six." -- Sidewinder missile jacket patch, showing a Sidewinder driving up the tail of a Russian Su-27