Jim Weirich, Creator of Rake, Has Passed Away 109
SirLurksAlot writes "News is beginning to circulate on Twitter and various sites that Jim Weirich, the creator of Rake, has passed away at the age of 58. He was an active developer (his last commit in the last 24 hours) and has made many contributions to the Ruby community over the years, as well as being a prolific speaker and teacher. He had a great sense of humor and was beloved by many. He will be greatly missed."
Creator of the Rake? (Score:1, Funny)
Wow. He must have been, like, 6,000 years old! I'm sure rakes have been around since the dawn of agriculture.
Re:What Now? (Score:4, Insightful)
WTF is "Rake" and why should anyone care? I gather it's some sort of Ruby thing, but again, why should anyone care?
Because Make sucks...
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Since when? Make is great. Even more so with GNU Make. It's portable, language agnostic, efficient, fast, scalable, parallelizable, easy to customize, text based, and so forth. This is why Make is still highly popular after 35 years. Yes, there are blogs that attempt to counter every one of those advantages but they also appear to be highly misinformed or biased, or they try to use make as a full all-in-one build system.
Yes, there are bad makefiles out there, but you can not prevent people using tools
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. Make is great. A well written Makefile is the key. I just wish we could dump automake and it's kin. They excel at creating massive and obtuse Makefiles so cluttered with useless gunk that you can't even find the build targets.
Make is a bit like Prolog. The target is your query and as a side effect of satisfying your query source becomes a working binary.
Re: (Score:2)
WTF is "Rake" and why should anyone care? I gather it's some sort of Ruby thing, but again, why should anyone care?
I either didn't know about Rake or Jim Weinrich before these news. It's indeed kind of awkward to hear about the software and the guy for the first time, when the developer dies.
It was the beta (Score:4, Funny)
He clicked something and beta came up...
FYI (Score:2, Informative)
Hi, Slashdot has sold out to Dice, and Alice Hill and her MBA goons are working hard to drive to turn this into another Slashington Post.
http://soylentnews.org/ [soylentnews.org]
Well over 2000 strong now, Dice.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Gah, stuck with a 4 digit ID like some noob...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There weren't any more details
I've heard that he received a mysterious video tape a week before his death. The tape was labeled "BETA". He then received a telemarketing call asking him to visit http://slashdot.org./ [slashdot.org.]
58 is pretty young (Score:4, Insightful)
Based on the Wikipedia photo It looks like he spent too much time improving his mind, and not enough taking care of his body.
If you look like Jim, it's time to change your diet and get active if you want a long healthy life. Tech like FitBit and Jawbone can help. Active gaming using Kinect instead of sitting with a controller, and spending 30 min a day weightlifting did wonders for me.
You'll feel better, think more clearly, and get positive attention from the opposite sex.
Re: (Score:1)
He didn't even lift, did he, brah?
Folks know the dangers of obesity, fuckhead. Perhaps it was a choice he made willingly. Either way, save it for another thread, douchebucket.
Re: 58 is pretty young (Score:2)
Sudden death is usually due to heart attacks. Being obese doesn't help with this matter.
Re: (Score:3)
Uhhh...or a heart attack at work.
https://news.ycombinator.com/i... [ycombinator.com]
Re: (Score:2)
"I hope you also realize how difficult it is to loose [sic] weight and stay fit as you age; Jim was 58."
Perhaps that is why they say that the best way to get in shape is not to get out of shape.
Re: (Score:2)
I hope you also realize how difficult it is to loose weight and stay fit as you age; Jim was 58.
I hope you realize you don't know how easy it is to lose weight and get fit as you age, especially if you're starting off sedentary.
I assume you're a bitter, fat fuck trying to justify your fat fuckiness.
Re: (Score:2)
PROTIP: Nothing is sacred on the Internet.
Re:58 is pretty young (Score:4, Insightful)
You might want to consider not criticizing people who encourage others to be healthier.
I don't think posting a directive for people to change their diets and get active if they "look like Jim" (on the day of the guy's death) qualifies as encouraging others to be healthier. Frankly, it comes off as inconsiderate, disrespectful and condescending.
But thanks for your concern about everyone's health. I'm sure your internet encouragements are working wonders.
Re: (Score:1)
Ir's the best time. Tragedy, and 'close calls' is the best motivator to get people started exercising.
This isn't his funeral, it's slashdot.
Re: (Score:3)
Ir's the best time. Tragedy, and 'close calls' is the best motivator to get people started exercising.
Tragedy and close calls that aren't close to home don't motivate squat. This is slashdot, remember?
But even if your questionable speculation above is true, you'd have to also assume that Mr. Flanagan has some magical powers that allow him to know the actual cause of Mr. Weirich's death. The fact is, he doesn't know the cause, and neither do you.
This isn't his funeral, it's slashdot.
Are you actually defending Flannigan's post? Do you really believe his completely unfounded supposition of the cause of Weirich's death? Or are you just defendin
Re: (Score:1)
When is the best time then? Being pissed off about such a young death and to then tell others to look after oneself is the best way to get the message across imho.
Re: (Score:2)
Lemme ask you a question, Mr. Flanagan: would you say those words while attending Mr. Weirich's memorial service? No?
Of copurse he wouldn't. You cvan only get punched in the nose so many times before it begins to resemble a small potato glued to your face.
Re: 58 is pretty young (Score:2, Insightful)
You don't know the details of what happened. I can tell you the answer is more complicated than not spending enough time working on your body. Sometimes, due to other medical conditions, people are unable to get around like they used to when they were younger. This makes other problems harder to tackle.
By jumping to conclusions about this man, you are proving to be insensitive and offensive and I hope that you take some time and reflect on that.
Re: (Score:2)
You'll feel better, think more clearly, and get positive attention from the opposite sex.
...but what if he was bi, you insensitive clod!
Re: (Score:2)
Is it cool though? I mean before I go, I'd love to take some time off first and relax.
Shocked (Score:5, Insightful)
I was taken aback when I heard the news. My thoughts go out to his family and friends. My understanding is that it may have been a heart attack.
You will be missed Jim. RIP.
Re: (Score:2)
My understanding is that it may have been a heart attack.
Source?
not a surpise - coders should take notice (Score:5, Interesting)
What's sad is some people will throw away their youth working excessive hours for some employer that won't care about them only to die in their 50's and they won't be famous enough to get all the kind messages like Jim has. Though I'm sure Jim rather be alive than having people saying nice things about him now.
We should recognise programming isn't necessarily a safe job and demand better rights.
Re: (Score:3)
Like most people here I spend a lot of time on the computer at home as well, but It only takes an hour a day of exercise to stay very fit. I know it can be hard to get motivated to get up and get active, but it's really worth it. You only get one body. Make the most of it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
There's actually a lot of evidence that sitting down the majority of your awake time (8+ hours) is itself bad for the body, and cannot be made up for with physical exercise. Working a few hours standing up and being mildly active (i.e. taking walks) during free time is better. Of course, one hour spent at the gym is better than one more hour in the couch. I'm just saying that if you have the opportunity to work standing up, it is likely worth a lot more than you think!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"What I do for the other 8 hours awake is up to me"
Lucky you, some of us don't get to live in our mothers basement for all eternity though and have to deal with everything from doing house choirs, to cooking food, to looking after kids, to spending time with our partners, to doing DIY jobs, to doing food shopping, to reading about new things to stay relevant and employable, to paying bills to getting the car fixed, and so on.
Now don't get me wrong, I did 35hrs a week study whilst also working 40hrs a week t
Re: (Score:2)
It's a great shame that he died so young but let's be honest, this isn't exactly surprising. If you're a developer it seems this outcome is far more likely than you'll live to be happy and fit into your 80's or 90's.
You've certainly got that right - the developer's life is a dangerous one, fraught with peril. To write code is to live fast and often to die young.
Re: (Score:1)
I was with you until the last sentence, then you went off the fucking rails.
We should recognise programming isn't necessarily a safe job and demand better rights.
Lolwut? Programming is a very safe job. I think you should go to a coal mine and tell the miners about how dangerous your job is and that they should punch you in the forehead and walk away laughing and shaking their heads in disbelief.
We don't need any more rights. As a fat programmer, I don't blame my job I blame me for stuffing my face and not exercising enough. I don't need to "demand better rights" to solve either of those
Jim will be Missed (Score:5, Insightful)
Please write better summaries (Score:2)
It would have taken all of three words to give those of us who are not developers a hint about what "Rake" is.
I mean, for chrissake...
Re: (Score:2)
If you're a developer, an explanation such as "It's kind of like make for Ruby" might suffice. But really, it's not quite like make, and strictly speaking it's not just for Ruby. So more than a very basic comparison with make gets pretty complicated.
And if you're not a developer... well, it's a tool that tells compilers how to compile source code into programs. Sort of.
Re: (Score:2)
Summary is incorrect (Score:2)
Jim was 57, not 58.
RIP
R.I.P. (Score:4, Informative)
I used to debate Jim on Usenet about software design. He was one of the best debate partners I've ever encountered. He was patient, detailed, articulate, asked good questions, and was honest when he could only provide anecdotal information instead of directly inspect-able evidence. (An example is measuring grokkability of code or designs to typical maintenance developers.)
A good many debaters turn it into a personal credibility battle when faced with anecdote-versus-anecdote impasses. Jim knew to let it go and let the stalemate be.
We'll miss you Jim! You set a great example.
-Tablizer
Condolences (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
as someone that values freedom of speech
Are you sure about that?
but is it time for Anonymous Coward to go?
I don't think so.
Let's face it... Anonymous Coward adds as much to a meaningful discussion as someone who drives past a coffee shop and yells out, "Look at me!".
Depends on the post. I've seen plenty of ACs who have posted comments I thought were insightful.
In the end, your post offended me. Time to ban Slashcrunch? Total lack of respect for my sensibilities.
Re: (Score:2)
First up, Jim's dead. He can't hear you. Maybe you should have thanked him last week?
Widely used feature? Is it?
"I can't believe I'm suggesting this as someone that values freedom of speech"
I can. most people become hypocritical when something they claim to believe in is used in away they don't happen to like.
Lets face it, a percentage of anonymous comments anywhere are, and always have been, crap. Maybe you should just read at a higher level?
See how annoying it is when some says "first off" and the never h
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think it has to be hypocritical. I can wish someone would be quiet or self censor, while at the same time respecting the right to speak. I can also appreciate there may be a time when someone wishes I would self censor and yet be glad that I would still have the right to speak if I felt compelled to do so.
In Other words I don't think a free-speech advocate is being hypocritical until he asks for someone else be censored, expressing a regret at hearing another's words is not a violation of the prin
Re: (Score:2)
He is saying people shouldn't speak anonymously; which is the corner stone of freedom of speech.
Re: (Score:2)
"He is saying people shouldn't speak anonymously; which is the corner stone of freedom of speech."
Here it is a usually a cornerstone of just being a jerk. The fact that someone was down voted for suggesting that we behave in a civil manner is pathetic.
Re: (Score:2)
Although I am tempted to agree with you I cannot. There are some topics where insider information is invaluable but identifiable posts would likely cause repercussions for the poster. We still need that. Anonymous Cowards on this topic are just that, cowards, but I don't see how we can get rid of them without getting rid of the more useful aspects of that role.
BTW, "OFF TOPIC" ... which fuckwit moderated that?
Re: (Score:2)
A fine example of an utter waste of space posted anonymously. I'll respond anyway...
Points 1, 3, 4, 4a, and 5 are all variations of Why bother to try to improve something?. How about actually arguing against the specific suggestion?
Also, it is nothing short of absurd to call someone a 'control freak' for suggesting that an online forum have different rules.
Re: (Score:2)
Uh, GP isn't arguing for disallowing A/C posts, he's simply pointing out the deficiencies in GGP's reasoning.
This is correct. I thought that was clear, but here we are again with:
You aren't going to get your way and there's not a thing you can do about it
Sigh. Rather than try to spell things out further, I'll just leave you a link: the appeal to force fallacy [wikipedia.org].
As for
no matter how superior you imagine yourself to be. Maybe you should go call your mommy now and tell her there is a mean man on the internet ...
Petty name-calling doesn't even count as a fallacy.
Re: (Score:2)