Microsoft Spending $75M To Boost K-12 CS Education, Put TEALS In 4,000 Schools 48
theodp writes: An NSF-funded evaluation of the Microsoft TEALS program — which sends volunteer software engineers with no teaching experience into high schools to teach kids and their teachers computer science — isn't scheduled to be completed until 2018. But having declared a K-12 CS education emergency (which it's linked to an H-1B visa emergency), Microsoft is going full speed ahead and spending $75 million to boost computer science in schools. The software giant told USA today that it aims to put TEALS in 700 high schools in the next three years and in 4,000 over the next decade, focusing on urban and rural districts to reach more young women and minorities. "In the U.S. alone, the economy will create 1.4 million new computing jobs by the year 2022," wrote Microsoft President and Code.org Board member Brad Smith. "Yet, less than a quarter of U.S. high schools currently teach computer science. That's not enough and we're working with schools and policy-makers to change that."
Re: (Score:1)
$400 billion pension payment...just like US gov't social security, keep punting the ball down the road...
Why not MBA (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Learning programming just creates new slaves
That's the point. That's what they want.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because they need the funding for equipment, and to free up their very limited budgets for other tasks. US teachers have very limited career choices and are juggling enormous social and bureaucratic demands, in an extremely stressful work environment. It's difficult to refuse such funding and support when they are scrambling to find teachers with computer skills who will, in fact, teach instead of switching to industry computer programming for far more money.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
How about we start with the one who taught you English?
They don't even sound the fucking same, you thick ignorant pillock.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Got to be careful. A lot of these donations are on a matching basis, so they can end up actually pulling money from other areas.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, as most people are idiots (and that unfortunately includes kids), MBAs would be perfect. The MBA is the reliable mark of anybody that cannot understand things but is still willing to attribute numbers and "manage" them. There is really no more reliable way to identify an idiot with a business-leaning.
Re: (Score:2)
This balance is almost gone in today's economy. These are the skills that kids need, because unless they kn
Re: (Score:2)
And there you are wrong about me, on several counts. But you had to fit my statement somehow into your simplified world-view...
I have met quite a few good managers. None of them went the MBA-route. In fact, most of the MBA-managers I know are bean-counters that do not know how to do their job and what it actually entails. Still does not make me "hate" them, that is just a transparent attempt by you to slander me.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
O.k. then. Actual management and business skills are beneficial to have. For example, I do mostly technical work, but I run frequently into situations where I have to decide whether something is cost-effective or not and that universally has business-aspects. Or I have to take over and drag meetings along because nobody else does and I am the external person that can do this without stepping on people's toes (this has to be done always politely, of course). Or I have to suggest management things to managers
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You are talking about entrepreneurship skills, something that is very hard to teach. Most studies show that it has to do more with how you are raised. Recently a study came out stating that those that survived disaster with little personal damage basically become pro-risk and are far more likely to start their own business.
Re: (Score:2)
And by emergency they mean (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Really? I mean... (Score:3)
I've heard of this time and time again. Is there any evidence that software engineers are good teachers? I mean, the challenge in K-12 is getting control of the students, not the teaching material (which is low level and entirely uninteresting).
Re: (Score:3)
Most people are not good teachers. Those that are have learned how to be over a long time and brought specific talent to the table in the first place. There is no reason to believe software engineers can do any better. But hey, it is Microsoft. Doing things badly is what they excel at.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Really? I mean... (Score:4, Funny)
We live near MS land and my son just finished a course where they sent a few programmers from MS to teach the course. While they did seem like capable programmers, they were not very good teachers.
THIS!
I rememberd my initial foray into Linux, I'd go online with a question, and the answer always came back:
"Oh, that's simple! All you have to do is" - and then immediately launched into a dissertation that had my head spinning in 5 seconds or less.
And I figured out pretty quickly that the person answering was trying to answer my question, but also trying to impress me with how smart he was. As well, a lot of things he took for granted that everyone knew.
And that is bad teaching. A teacher has to break things down, and bring them to the level of the person being taught. And most software engineers I know can't do that. Because they are pretty darn smart - just ask them.
Re: (Score:2)
Software engineering is hard. Therefore, it is a superset of all things that aren't hard, like poetry and history and all that shit.
Not at all. The ability to teach depends on the person, not what they do. A lot of SW engineers haven't ever tried to teach, so who knows. But it is definitely a different skill set.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, $MySubject is hard.
Accounting? Just adding numbers up.
Programming? Just typing (usually with too many semicolons)
Law? Just standing up and talking.
Medicine? They just prod you a bit and try some pills, and if those don't work they try some other one.
Teaching? Same as law, except they believe what they're saying more than half the time.
What's Good for Microsoft is Good for K-12 Schools (Score:3)
Microsoft's announcement coincidentally came a day after New York City announced an $81M public-private K-12 CS mandate [slashdot.org], which prompted Microsoft's Smith to join fellow FWD.us PAC backers [www.fwd.us] Ron Conway and Fred Wilson, as well other execs from Google, Facebook, and Goldman Sachs, to explain to the masses "Why Computer Science for All is Good for All" in An Open Letter from the Nation's Tech and Business Leaders [medium.com]. Making an argument worthy of a tantrum-throwing toddler [babble.com], the execs exclaimed in a pull-quote, "We need talent [venturebeat.com], we need it now, and we simply cannot find enough."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Need help. Any India child of four can program a computer. Stupid American child of four can do what? Nothing. That is what.
Is this your Brahmin Children or the ones who have to look foward to a job market that consists of cleaning your sewers?
Re: (Score:2)
meanwhile, in the real world ... (Score:4, Informative)
Thousands are being laid off at HP, Qualcomm and others.
Most have little hope of an equivalent job.
So much for the urgent need for programmers.
What could possibly go wrong? (Score:4, Insightful)
volunteer software engineers with no teaching experience into high schools to teach kids and their teachers computer science
It's like they're trying to put kids off CS before they even have to choose.
MS spends $75M to coax CS education. (Score:1)
In an expensive move MS invests $75M to try to steer CS education toward propitiatory closed source environment.
The Microsoft slashdot .. (Score:2)