Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
IT

IFTTT Enables 3rd-Party Devs To Integrate the Service Into their Products (techhive.com) 18

IFTTT (short for If this then that) has made a name for itself as a platform for people to easily automate tasks between various apps. The company announced on Wednesday that it is now allowing developing partners to embed those IFTTT recipes directly in their own third-party apps. TechHive adds: This should enable IFTTT to expand its user base beyond the 1.4 million enthusiasts who are already using the service. Smart-home device users who own products such as the Ring video doorbell, LIFX smart bulbs, the Foobot indoor air monitor, and the Garagio smart garage-door operator will gain the capability to use IFTTT recipes directly from their product's apps starting Wednesday. You'll still need to sign up for an IFTTT account if you don't have one, but you'll be able to do that without leaving the third-party device's app. "It lets them tell the story now," said CEO Linden Tibbett. "A good analogy is to think of how PayPal handles payment... We want to be that standard for asking and granting access from one service to another."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

IFTTT Enables 3rd-Party Devs To Integrate the Service Into their Products

Comments Filter:
  • Crestron integration!

    • Crestron integration is already happening with this from what I've heard from others in the industry. It's not native supported by Crestron, but more of a custom hack-together solution, being experimented with by a couple of people here and there but it is happening already, at least on a few programmers test bench (not sure if anything has been deployed in the field or to someones house yet). Same with Amazon Echo integration with Crestron, so you can talk to your Crestron control system and have it do t
  • That [slashdot.org] IFTTT?
    • by q4Fry ( 1322209 )

      Yes, exactly. They want other people to use their "service" so that they can later hold the service for ransom. This is their "path to monetization."

  • by Anonymous Coward

    The name of this organization is deceptively similar to something that sounds like the name of a standards body.

  • by HeckRuler ( 1369601 ) on Wednesday August 10, 2016 @03:21PM (#52679763)

    Holy shit. This is annoying as hell.
    Their webpage is intentionally vague. You can't find out SHIT about it unless you sign up.

    Let me save you some time guys.

    What the fuck is IFTTT:

    It's a tool to program common tasks within a set group of services when a trigger occurs.
    Tasks like: scan everything in /r/books for "sci-fi" and send a summary to an email. Do it daily. Sum up the number of reads your IMDB review got and text it to you at 10pm so you can cry yourself to sleep.

    Hey, it's bringing automation scripts to the masses. Most people won't learn Bash scripting, this is sort of like lowering the bar. Unfortunately, it doesn't give them any control and assumes they're on a phone. You hand it access to all the accounts, so it's DAMN scary from a security perspective.

    Last I looked, it was very anti-thetical to open source, but if they're allowing third-party scripts, that's a small step in the right direction... And absolutely HORRIFYING from a security perspective.

    It's only legit "value-add" over a set of bash scripts people can run, is that it handles the security aspect and handles ALL YOUR PASSWORDS. Which is also the part that smells the most.

    I want to see a competitor though: Parse This Bullshit, Then That Bash. PFTBTTB. It carries it's own theme-song.

    • The summary sounded like they were opening up IFTTT for manufacturers to use it internal to their own software. For example, that might mean that if Belkin so chooses, instead of their own scripting rules in the WEMO app they could use IFTTT scripting. It doesn't seem like they are opening up their ecosystem for third party scripting.
      • ...Why would any company willingly lock themselves into using a third-party scripting language that they have no control over?

  • by cerberusss ( 660701 ) on Thursday August 11, 2016 @03:53AM (#52682897) Journal

    In March this year, the owner of Pinboard complained about IFTTT's terms:
    https://blog.pinboard.in/2016/... [pinboard.in]

    What it comes down to, is that if you integrate IFTTT with your product, you have to agree to the following terms:
    - You implement their API but it's not the public one, instead it's an API which is only shown after agreeing to the terms
    - When they change their API, you promptly update your code as well
    - You will never compete with them
    - They own the rights to all content that's pumped into IFTTT
    - If you add something clever to the API, they own the patents

  • Wtf is Ifttt?

Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do not understand.

Working...