Oracle Lays Off More Than 1,000 Employees (zdnet.com) 171
An anonymous reader writes: According to the Mercury News, Oracle is laying off approximately 450 employees in its Santa Clara hardware systems division. Reports at The Layoff, a discussion board for technology business firings, claim about 1,800 employees company-wide are being pink-slipped. Oracle claims the company isn't closing the Santa Clara facility with this reduction in force. Instead, "Oracle is refocusing its Hardware Systems business, and for that reason, has decided to lay off certain of its employees in the Hardware Systems Division."
Good bye to Solaris (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Looks like this is the end of Sun SPARC and Solaris.
Good riddance if you ask me, it was getting quite antiquated relative to Linux. Now we just need to kill off AIX. Hopefully everyone will standardize around Linux and BSD.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
AIX is easier to administer than Linux.
AIX is an abomination. ODM, smitty? Umm no thanks. I liked the POWER platform though.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: Good bye to Solaris (Score:2, Interesting)
Ridicule AIX if you must, but the fact remains that I've never had an AIX system fail to boot for me due to an init system failure, while I've experienced multiple such problems with Linux due to systemd.
AIX, Solaris, HP-UX, and FreeBSD all have their place, and it's when reliability and stability are a must. Linux, especially now with the systemd nonsense that's going on, cannot compete with them.
Re: (Score:1)
Really? I haven't had a boot failure in SystemD since Debian switched while I was running Debian experimental(years ago), and even then it was down to a bad entry in /etc/fstab (I had removed a disk) and it wasn't a total failure, the boot just hung for the total 5 minute timeout without telling me anything (now it tells you what it is waiting for) instead of immediately failing the way it did before.
If you are having multiple failures you are clearly doing something wrong. It has been solid on all of m
Re: (Score:1)
I also have seen what a problem with mounting due to systemd can cause.
Whether it would have recovered after 5 minutes I cannot say - I cannot afford the downtime, especially when there's no explicit report as to what the hangup is. Besides, what's this about "the big advantage of systemd is faster boots" if it wants to park itself for 5 minutes?
While there are some significant advantages that a theoretical systemd (i.e., one that confined itself to process management instead of Universe+dog) would have ove
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yup, as all here know I'm a BSD neckbeard but there's a different between industrial-strength OSes like AIX and Solaris and those where basically one guy can come along and fuck things up. Yeah, you guessed, not a fan of systemD
Re: (Score:2)
I've never seen problems booting due to systemd
Systemd is pants-on-head retarded when dealing with Network Manager and waking from sleep. It /never/ reactivates the network.
It is also pants-on-head retarded when a sound service won't start and it will just fucking /wait/ there while it won't start, instead of just failing it and moving on.
These are issues I've personally had to deal with. With Ubuntu LTS, no less.
And the whole point of systemd, so I've been told, is to make it /easier/ for workstation use
Re: Good bye to Solaris (Score:2)
"Systemd is pants-on-head retarded when dealing with Network Manager and waking from sleep. It /never/ reactivates the network."
In over 3 years running a distro using systemd, I've never seen this problem. All network interfaces work correctly on resume (except the 3G modem that needs its driver reloaded, but this is a driver problem).
"It is also pants-on-head retarded when a sound service won't start and it will just fucking /wait/ there while it won't start, instead of just failing it and moving on."
Neve
Re: (Score:3)
SPARC/Solaris is mainly used for legacy systems that are too expensive to port to x86, or where the source or expertise to do the port no longer exist. It would be insane to use S/S for any new project. So it is a dwindling market, and it just passed the point where it is no longer profitable to develop new hardware. The existing systems will continue to be available, but they will fall further and further behind and eventually fade away.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Good bye to Solaris (Score:3)
" x86/Linux just doesn't cut it. I remember I had a Solaris box in a closet that ran consistently I actually forgot to reboot it for 5 years. The only reason I did wind up rebooting it was because it's memory got upgraded because certain functions got a little slower over time as things grew. Quadrupling memory (memory got both cheaper and larger in the meantime) and boom - back to like it was new. x86 Linux systems, at least pre-systemd, were ok but still require some hand-holding. More than 180 days of up
Re: (Score:1)
Some of our Linux servers that are not exposed to any hostile networks and inconvenient to reboot (e.g. monitoring display server that is displayed, along with other stuff, on a 30mx6m video wall) have uptimes of 5 years or more.... I also can't think why systemd would have any impact on uptime ...
5 years? Seriously? You're running on an 5 year old kernel with multiple known issues (TLS, OpenSSL, etc)? I hope they're firewalled well. As for systemd, you must not be very well versed in it. SSH Fails [launchpad.net], NTP [github.com] magically fixed a service startup issue [github.com], no one knows why, and just a general list of why systemd sucks [bsdmag.org]. And that took all of 2 min to search, read, and compile, because I wanted to give you some solid backing for stating it sucks. You're in RH land with supported versions, so it's likely that these p
Re: (Score:2)
Some of our Linux servers that are not exposed to any hostile networks and inconvenient to reboot (e.g. monitoring display server that is displayed, along with other stuff, on a 30mx6m video wall) have uptimes of 5 years or more.... I also can't think why systemd would have any impact on uptime ...
5 years? Seriously? You're running on an 5 year old kernel with multiple known issues (TLS, OpenSSL, etc)?
I didn't say they don't get any updates at all. They just don't have kernel updates applied. There are multiple firewalls protecting these specific servers from hostile users/networks, and 90% of the people who have any access at all (e.g. HTTPS access) have sudo rights to run various things as root on them anyway. The only systems that have any firewall access to them are the other monitoring servers, and all the monitoring software is kept up-to-date.
As for systemd, you must not be very well versed in it. SSH Fails [launchpad.net],
Yes, some versions of systemd introducing new features
Re: (Score:1)
And that took all of 2 min to search, read, and compile, because I wanted to give you some solid backing for stating it sucks.
Yes, it is trivial to find old bugs that are fixed, and FUD complaints from systemd haters about behaviour that has been improved.
I'll note that with 1 "fixed" bug, the rest appeared to all be current. You give a specific instance where systemd helps you. Just one. IIRC, you should be able to achieve the same effect in the other scripts by merely checking and waiting on pieces to come up (admittedly, this has been more than a few years, my memory may be hazy as to its simplicity) You also specify several workarounds outside of systemd to deal with things others don't like. The thing you don't address is why systemd, purportedly a star
Re: (Score:2)
You give a specific instance where systemd helps you. Just one.
No, I was responding to one of the examples provided as to why 'systemd sucks' in that it seemed (in the past) to hang at boot if there was a bad entry in /etc/fstab. There is good justification for what systemd is doing (and sysvinit doesn't assist the admin at all in this regard, so the sysvinit user is left to modify all sorts of scripts like rc.sysinit - that will be overwritten by a software update - to resolve these problems).
As someone who has also been involved in packaging software for linux distro
Re: (Score:1)
No, I was responding to one of the examples provided as to why 'systemd sucks' in that it seemed (in the past) to hang at boot if there was a bad entry in /etc/fstab.
It'd be nice if there were dependencies marked and things could move on while it waited. I don't recall if systemd allows for this now. I obviously haven't looked at a system in a while, and this only takes me down memory lane.
[init scripts]
I (and you) might be able to, but at present I doubt any of my colleagues would be able to do it correctly without leaving a booby trap for the next sysadmin.
It is true that init script editing can be obtuse. Then again, you should know what you're doing when you're mucking about with the configuration of enterprise systems. If your colleagues can't do it correctly, perhaps they shouldn't be tasked with those types of jobs. I wouldn't expe
Re: (Score:2)
Are we still talking about Solaris, or NetWare? :)
Re: (Score:1)
Seriously? Linux kernel based operating systems are decades behind Solaris.
When will Linux get a real memory manager? (current memory manager equal to congress's budgets - spend more than you have and kill off important things like education to pay for congressional vacations, healthcare and lifetime salaries).
When will Linux get dtrace?
When will Linux get a filesystem / volume manager that gets even close to being as good as ZFS?
As I said, Linux kernel based operating systems are toys for tots, not real
Re: (Score:3)
Amen to this... what Solaris is good at, it is shockingly good at.
Linux's internals look like the worst possible design-by-committee abomination possible.
The problem is that all the cool kids are using Linux, and Solaris has been dying on the vine for years. Unless you're buying hardware from Oracle, it's getting increasingly difficult to find drivers supported on Solaris; vendors are not investing the time and effort to support their new hardware on the 20-year old Solaris platform. At least, that's what
Re: (Score:3)
A Fedora installation used to feel different from, say, a Debian installation. These days the biggest difference is whether you type "apt-get" or "yum" to manage packages.
That was sooo last year. This year, Fedora uses "dnf" instead of yum. It only has a subset of the functionality that yum provided, but it's new!!!1! and what's missing will the there Real Soon Now.
I think the name dnf is an apt name...
Re: (Score:2)
and what's missing will the there Real Soon Now
Does dnf stand for "definitely not finished"?
Re: Monoculture == Stagnation (Score:1)
Does not function?
Re: (Score:2)
Solaris we already knew from the post about Solaris 12 a few days back, so now, this seals it for the SPARC as well. The Sun part of Oracle is dead
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
If Only... (Score:5, Funny)
If only someone at the Oracle could have foretold this.
Re:If Only... (Score:5, Funny)
Mod parent up!!! (Score:1)
Oracle Delphi could have predicted this.
Who says a Liberal Arts education/knowledge is worthless!!!!
Look how it has enriched our lives. Liberal arts is history, art, the finer stuff .... and the neurosciences geeks would argue that ALL human knowledge is interrelated.
I for one breezed through data structures because I used music analogies. Easiest 'A' in a two week Summer session ever.
Re: (Score:2)
I took Symbolic Logic from the philosophy department, which was labeled "humanities" in my school, but seemingly would fall into your "liberal arts" category. It was extremely applicable to programming and database logic.
Re: (Score:2)
It's sad when people don't remember wgere names come from. Like why Borland called it Delphi.
It's oracle, so... (Score:5, Funny)
I feel for the 500 lawyers, 200 managers, 50 directors, 149 assistant and one temp programmer needing to find a new job...
Re: (Score:2)
No love for the Salespeople?
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks (Score:4, Funny)
Wonder how long before (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Where's Trump when you need him?
Simple math shows that Trump is likely irrelevant.
California salaries > Indian salaries + Trump import tax
Re: (Score:2)
So why not "outsource" to somewhere cheaper in the center of the country. Just pick a breadbasket state and go for it. The map here is a good reference: How Much $100 is really worth in every state [washingtonpost.com]. Think of it like playing with exchange rates, but domestically.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Foxconn, the world's largest contract electronics maker, is considering setting up a display-making plant in the United States in an investment that would exceed $7 billion, company chairman and chief executive Terry Gou said on Sunday.
The plans come after U.S. President Donald Trump pledged to put "America First" in his inauguration speech on Friday, prompting Gou to warn about the rise of protectionism and a trend for politics to underpin economic development.
You really have to admit that 30-50k new jobs is significant.
Gou said he told Son that the United States has no panel-making industry but it is the second-largest market for televisions. An investment for a display plant would exceed $7 billion and could create about 30,000-50,000 jobs, Gou told Son.
You can hate on him all you want, but if fear of Trump can bring manufacturing jobs back, the people whose livelihood depended on manufacturing jobs and who voted for him are going to be happy they did. As for the rest, you should all wish for m
Re: (Score:1)
I am really hoping that Trump is simply a genius and manages to have the cake and eat it too. There is the slim-but-now-not-non-existent chance that we can: 1) still stand for free trade, 2) end up with most of the high-tech infrastructure construction, rendering 3) the US a manufacturing powerhouse and export king. If Trump threatens enough that people actually build *mega-factory* in America, America will actually be best poised to export *megaFactoryProducts*. That said, it is going to be really hard
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
[...] the people whose livelihood depended on manufacturing jobs and who voted for him are going to be happy they did.
Except Trump isn't going to bring back the manufacturing jobs of yesteryear. A new factory today will hire a few dozen workers to handle a machine that does the work of 1,500 workers.
Re: (Score:3)
There are over a million skilled manufacturing jobs unfilled right now. There's plenty to manufacture, but skilled workers willing to do blue-collar work are hard to find. Sure, we'll never return to the old days, "but the good old days weren't always good, and tomorrow ain't as bad as it seems".
Re: (Score:2)
There's plenty to manufacture, but skilled workers willing to do blue-collar work are hard to find.
Is the problem a lack of skilled workers willing to do the job or employers unwilling to train non-skilled workers?
Based on my experience in Fortune 500 companies, employers are looking for people who already have the necessary job skills and could start without any training. One manager told me that he could train me but it would be a waste of his time as I would only leave to get a better paying job at a competitor. Never mind that many employees were training themselves, getting certified and leaving for
Re: (Score:2)
Employers don't train. Never have. Not really their core competency. The failure lies elsewhere, but it is a failure, and one we must address as a society as unskilled jobs dwindle away.
Re: (Score:2)
Employers don't train. Never have. Not really their core competency.
That's because bean counters on Wall Street declared training as an unnecessary expense back in the 1980's. Since then it has become the public school system responsibility to train students into employees. If you don't know how to flip burgers out of high school, you're unemployable for the rest of your life.
Re: (Score:2)
Not just the 80s - employers have never been willing to train for skilled labor, unless you go back to old-school apprenticeships, starting at age 12 and replacing later schooling. With some relevant training, employers will generally soak of the cost of the last 10%, just as you do when hiring someone from a non-identical job elsewhere. But that takes proving that you've already learned the basics, or a similar skill (and thus proving you can learn).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Never mind that many employees were training themselves, getting certified and leaving for better paying jobs at competitors anyway.
So do the math. Which is better, from the employer's perspective: Paying to train employees and watching them leave for better paying jobs at competitors, or letting the employees cover the cost of that training themselves?
Re: (Score:2)
So do the math.
I find your lack of math skills disturbing. ;)
Paying to train employees and watching them leave for better paying jobs at competitors, or letting the employees cover the cost of that training themselves?
You left out the last part of employees training themselves: "and watching them leave for better paying jobs at competitors." Either way the employee leaves and the resulting turnover cost more in money to find a replacement than an existing employee.
Re: (Score:2)
The infrastructure and support staff it takes to manage what the bots are doing takes a little more than "a few dozen workers" in those factories. Think shipping, raw materials, management... that's why they have such large parking lots. Full automation is coming, buts it not quite here yet.... there may not be many assembly line jobs left, but forklift drivers, automation specialists, various clerks and faces... they still put a LOT of people to work.
Re: (Score:2)
The infrastructure and support staff it takes to manage what the bots are doing takes a little more than "a few dozen workers" in those factories.
Not according to The Wall Street Journal.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-factories-are-working-again-factory-workers-not-so-much-1482080400 [wsj.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Paywalled...... Sucks, I would have loved to read that. Oh well. I guess if I wanna afford to read the Wall Street Journal I better Check. [tesla.com] These. [robojobs.org] Out.. [indeed.com] Instead. [careerbuilder.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Paywalled...... Sucks, I would have loved to read that.
Or read it on Yahoo for free.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-factories-working-again-factory-170300301.html [yahoo.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
First off, it the article said "could", not will. This is just a play to Trump's ego, he's such an easy mark.
Re: (Score:2)
The estimate is 30,000 to 50,000 new jobs.
For American or foreign workers? When I tried to break into electronic assembly work in Silicon Valley in the 1990's, all the work was done by Filipinos who came over to the U.S. to work these jobs. Being the only white guy in line when a company was hiring, I was told to go away when I asked for an application.
Re: (Score:2)
If that were true it wouldn't be cost effective to export jobs to third world countries.
Manufacturing is returning to the US because it's cheaper than China. The use of automation reduces the amount of labor needed to run the factories here.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
They better watch it - Foxconn [reuters.com] is thinking of opening a $7 Billion display screen factory in the USA, on top of $50 Billion, and you know darned well that fear of Trump putting duties on them is part of it.
Nope. I don't know or believe that for a second. See, I'm not dumb. I can actually read that Foxconn had plans before Trump even threw his hat into the ring.
More importantly, I dislike governance by fear, and what I also know is that if ANYBODY on the left-wing side said anything like what Trump purports to do, the Republicans would shake in their boots at the vileness of government interfering with the free market, and most importantly, I know that the suffering factory workers in Asia, whose plight I a
Re: (Score:2)
I can actually read that Foxconn had plans before Trump even threw his hat into the ring
Cite your source, please. I think the jobs issue is much more complex than Trump lets on. But, the last 4 presidents certainly weren't friends of manufacturing. I do see the Foxconn commitment as "fear of Trump". But, I can be convinced otherwise should you find an article demonstrating something counter to Reuters article.
Re: (Score:2)
First, you are full of shit. Foxconn originally planned to reduce overall employment at their factories by replacing workers with robots, while building new factories, so they could increase production while reducing headcount. It didn't work out quite how they hoped. Turns out it's easier to replace white-collar jobs with Watson. When AI learns how to code AI, the trend will accelerate.
Also, the reuters story I linked to also talks about Foxconn's plans for another $50 billion in investment - that's a tot
Re: (Score:1)
Companies "think" about doing things all the time. Get back to us when it actually happens. Secondly, even if it does happen why do you presume Foxconn won't just heavily automate it so as to hire as a few people as possible?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You can hate on him all you want, but if fear of Trump can bring manufacturing jobs back, the people whose livelihood depended on manufacturing jobs and who voted for him are going to be happy they did
It's really fascinating how insane this presidency is. The left in the developed world has traditionally been against globalization and free trade, precisely out of fear of low-wage jobs not being competitive against developing countries overseas. Also out of fear of environmental and labor exploitation in countries with less regulations. It was the conservative, pro big business agenda to push for more globalization and free trade.
Now you have Trump, who is a businessman himself and ran as a Republican, ye
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
He's Right wing on some things, and Left wing on others. Yeah, he supports LGBT rights, while on abortion, his current stance supports banning late term abortions, except for the usual rape, incest & life of the mother. He's also opposed to publicly funding abortions, hence the Mexico City executive order of today
His trade policy is arguably Left Wing, although I've seen plenty of Conservatives switch over to his side: the Tom Friedman arguments don't hold water w/ people when they start losing the
Re: (Score:2)
BS. This is just Foxconn playing el Presidente Tweety's ego. He's such a rube.
Re: (Score:1)
Ok black list from using H1B's for some time unles (Score:2)
Ok black list from using H1B's for some time unless they hire USC's first.
Math (Score:2)
Looks like good old Larry can fund himself another megayacht now.
Re: (Score:2)
Tiny (Score:1)
Alternative Fact: Trump supporters are well endowed.
Oracle, what a joke. (Score:5, Interesting)
It's a known quantity. Oracle rep lie sell their substandard product with shitty support, piecemeal features, and a huge bill. You deserve what you get. Almost as bad as contracting with IBM, but not quite. IBM has decent support.
Re: (Score:2)
Fair enough. I'm not hip to IBMs shitlord status anymore, thank god.
Trump (Score:1)
I wonder if Trump will claim this too as "made available 1000 highly skilled workers to Make us great again"
Cisco model... (Score:2)
Oracle H1B applications (Score:2)
http://www.myvisajobs.com/Visa... [myvisajobs.com]
"Oracle America, Inc. has filed 2999 labor condition applications for H1B visa and 1876 labor certifications for green card from fiscal year 2014 to 2016. Oracle America was ranked 23 among all visa sponsors. Please note that 49 LCA for H1B Visa and 102 LC for green card have been denied or withdrawn during the same period."
So, wonder what this will say for 2017? And wonder if these H1Bs were let go before the layoffs?
Is Trump taking credit for this one too (Score:3, Insightful)
This one combined with Microsoft's layoffs has already cancelled out the few hundred jobs Trump was so proud of keeping in the US a few weeks. Maybe the Oracle employees can get a job at Carrier.
Re: (Score:2)
So long SPARC? (Score:2)
I guess this coupled with the announcement about Solaris last week means Oracle is finally finished squeezing the last pennies out of the SPARC/Solaris architecture. Admittedly it's very rare to see new implementations of a proprietary UNIX...every place I've dealt with in the last few years is trying to rid themselves of all the legacy code and hardware that keeps them on Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, etc.
I wonder what kind of cost/benefit calculation they came up with. The company I work for has a bunch of mainfra
The bubble is bursting (Score:1)
Hope you saved some money
Regular occurance (Score:3)
As someone who once worked for a company led by a former Oracle Exec, this is par for the course. Larry Ellison is legendary for his "environment of fear" where they lay people off every 6 months both to keep people afraid for their jobs, and to pump up bonus money for the middle management above the people in question.
Happened at the company I worked for, and though I was ostensibly safe due to my skill set, I finally got sick of watching good people that I had worked with for over a decade that I knew were doing good work being laid off to meet a quota.
Fuck Oracle. Fuck Larry Ellison, and fuck every exec that learned that horse shit from him.
Re:Surprised? (Score:5, Informative)
Oracle is less and less a software company and becoming more about making sales, then gouging their clients.
That has been true for 30 years. I remember making an inquiry in the early 1990s, and instead of giving me technical specs, they started badgering me for the name of the "decision maker". When I finally relented and gave them the name of my (non-technical) boss, they ignored me, and started calling him using pushy tactics that would make a door-to-door vacuum cleaner salesman proud.
Re: (Score:1)
Remember next time. "I am the decision maker for my 200M division, however I haven't had enough hookers and blow to make a decision in weeks"
Captcha: expunge
Oracle "gouging their clients" (Score:1)
One example of Oracle's gouging, two stories:
Oregon settles bitter legal fight with Oracle for $100 million [oregonlive.com]
Oregon Reaches $100 Million Settlement With Oracle [opb.org]
How it happens: Managers with no technical knowledge believe they can buy contracts for technology development. Technology companies know they can say anything and it will usually be accepted.
Another example of an ignorant manager assuming it is possible to manage technology without knowing anything
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
Former U.S. President Barack Obama often acts like a knowledgeable leader even when the depth of his knowledge is extremely shallow.
Good thing we've got the new guy. He'd never do that.
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pink%20slipped
My favorite pseudo-etymology is that your employer gives you back your pink slip [wikipedia.org], so you can sell your soul to another company...
Re: (Score:1)
nope, trump finds that the cost of dumping oracle is huge and as a business guy will make the same decision... fuck it, keep using oracle
It he tried to rise oracle taxes... oracle will rise the cost for their products and the money will return to oracle pockets
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Enterprise & custom hardware [Re:Good Riddance (Score:2)
It's not the they sell "bureaucracy", it's that they lock you in and charge too much.
Their products are indeed targeted toward "enterprise" applications, where you want stability and reliability, which is sometimes called "bureaucracy". If you are a smallish risk-taking start-up, then Oracle products are probably not for you.
However, Oracle's problem in the enterprise arena is that they gradually trick you into paying an arm and leg over the longer run. Now that MS-SQL-Server is focusing more on the high-
Re: (Score:2)
If you worked at hardware or software at Sun you can start sending resumes to NVIDIA and Intel. I think they have some HQ in Santa Clara.