Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Programming Microsoft Stats

Is Visual Basic .NET More Popular Than JavaScript? (zdnet.com) 100

Posted by EditorDavid from the conduct-of-code dept.
Microsoft's Visual Basic .NET now ranks above JavaScript, PHP, SQL on TIOBE's index of programming language popularity, which ZDNet notes is "the highest it's ever been since [TIIOBE] started tracking the Microsoft language in 2001." Tiobe analysts said it was "very surprising" that Visual Basic .Net is now the fifth most popular language, only behind C++, Python, C, and Java. It's even ahead of JavaScript, which currently lies in seventh place, down from sixth a year ago. C# meanwhile fell from fifth spot a year ago to sixth this month. The language index still reckons Visual Basic .Net will "sooner or later go into decline", but concedes it's popular for dedicated office applications in small and medium enterprises, and is probably still used by many developers because it's easy to learn.
TIOBE's methodology "basically...comes down to counting hits for the search query +"<language> programming," TIOBE explains on its web page -- though its results don't always agree with other analysts.

InfoWorld points out that on this month's PyPL Popularity of Programming Language index, which analyzes how often language tutorials are searched for on Google, VB.NET "doesn't even register Visual Basic.Net or Visual Basic among its Top 10 languages" -- and JavaScript comes in third, behind only Python and Java.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Is Visual Basic .NET More Popular Than JavaScript? More

Is Visual Basic .NET More Popular Than JavaScript?

Comments Filter:
  • Maybe because schools think the Basic language is basic enough to be taught to kids?
  • That's why Microsoft created Typescript - to fix Javascript. Javascript is great for hacking together something that no one else will use, but for use in a team, it fosters the creation of mountains of muck that no one can make sense of. The same is true of Python and Ruby. Sure, you don't have to worry about declaring types, but you pay for that big time when you try to figure out the code months later.

    • Javascript, as a language is okay but I find its run-time environment to be the big issue - especially when you're (ironically) trying to do real time interactive programming (which I believe it was created for).

    • The same is true of Python and Ruby. Sure, you don't have to worry about declaring types, but you pay for that big time when you try to figure out the code months later.
      Types are usually obvious. And if not, the IDE needs only one or two clicks to show you the type ...

      • But the IDE cannot always know - the right hand side of the assignment often is a function (with an unspecified return type). I cannot tell you the angst I have had reverse engineering other people's code in Python and Ruby, costing me hours of wasted time and huge frustration, having to go hunting for a function to see what kind of object it creates, only to find that it calls another function, which returns some unknown object type, and so on. The same is true of Go, which doesn't really have types - hour

        • Type unsafe is not the same as not needing to declare a type. (Static versus Dynamic typing on one axis and safe type system and unsafe type system on the other axis)

          JavaScript is only unsafe in regards of a few stupid decisions about type coercions like between strings, booleans and ints. If you use objects it is type safe.

          Modern languages that omit declaration of types usually use type interference (like Scala). That is only relevant at the point of definition of a variable, functions usually still need t

          • "Type unsafe is not the same as not needing to declare a type." - yes, good point. Java, e.g., is needlessly verbose in that regard. Scala fixes that.

            "functions usually still need to declare the returning type" - that's the real need. I have not coded in Javascript in a long time, so I don't remember the rules anymore. I know that Python and Ruby (and Go) are horrible in this regard, mainly in the instance of function (method) return types, having spent many hours reverse engineering people's code just to f

  • How was the testing assumption validated? (Score:4)

    by mykepredko ( 40154 ) on Saturday December 08, 2018 @12:55PM (#57771424) Homepage

    So in RFTA this ranking, TIOBE is counting the number of times somebody queries "C programming", "Java programming", etc. while weighting the number according to the search engine used.

    Where is the basic research that says a programmer is using a if they are doing a search on " programming"?

    I would really like to see something like tracking the number of lines of code being put on GitHub for each language as a more realistic measurement followed by the number of contributors - that would give you a realistic idea of how many people are programming in a language along with the number of lines of code that are being produced.

    Until we get something like this, how about we cut back on the monthly or more frequent /. stories stating that "XYZ is the most popular programming language" based on some arbitrary measurement system that hasn't been validated in any way.

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Their methodology is desperately stupid, as is their analysis. Deciding that SQL can come back because it's Turing complete is eye-rolling pedantry. And obviously the "popularity" of VB.net didn't go up by more than 100% in a month in any real way.

      But I'm not sure how I'd do better. GitHub is going to overrepresent languages popular for open source and independent developers. Meanwhile, a disproportionate amount of the world's .NET code is going to be sitting on some company's TFS server, opaque to the w

    • Microsoft Marketing: Hey, we heard some tech news website is publishing a ranking of programming languages based on how often they come up in searches with the word "programming". Is that right?

      Microsoft Engineering: Huh? Oh yeah, they do that every year.

      Microsoft Marketing: Would it be possible to slip in an update that makes each copy of Windows run a search on all the major search engines for ".NET programming" say, once a week? Y'know, not often enough to be noticed by people monitoring network

    • It's worse than that. They don't count number of queries, they only count number of pages that are shown as a result of the query. Old languages with thousands of forum and blog postings naturally have an advantage this way, and also languages with names that also have another popular meaning. For example, Google shows not only programming links for "Dart programming", and also shows "Visual Studio basics" as a result for "Visual Basic programming".

      TIOBE is a bad-bad-bad index, I don't understand why somebo

  • PHP bashing (Score:3)

    by hcs_$reboot ( 1536101 ) on Saturday December 08, 2018 @01:00PM (#57771450)
    At last, we talk about a language crappier than PHP
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Worse, Python and VB.Net share many similarities to the point that there are only minor formatting differences between simple programs. It's a good laugh to see programmers say they only use Python, and then bitch about VB.Net.

    • Glade + GTK3 + Perl (or C++, python or other language of your choice) for running on a REAL opsys. Faster, better, cheaper. Oh wait, that's a NASA saying.

      • GTK is a C toolkit.

        However UI programming screams for something object oriented. Using C for it is just a pain in the ass.

        • GTK is an ABI, Glade produces XML, and any language can eat it (at least the ones I work with) and there is zero need for my writing of any object, though the Perl GTK library produces a few that I just use (ditto for python and AFAIK C, but I haven't done a GUI in C or C++ since MFC and windows. I don't have to care what language GTK is written in, that's the point. I can write for it in any language that can eat the XML glade produces, I'd be an idiot to program for it directly, the WYSIWYG editor remo

          • Most UIs I worked on can not be described in UI editors. So you always have to interfere with the API of the toolkit.

            I remember MFC ... shudder. I bought a Zapp license to not being forced to use MFC.

            • DevStudio 6 had a very nice GUI editor and a bunch of automatic MFC macros that made good UI easy to do...but the learning curve on MFC was very difficult... So far, it was the best combo of GUI and code editor I ever worked on, and we learned how to munge our own data xfer macros as well, it was nice. Then they VB'd it to hell with that .NOT shit, I stopped getting paid to fix windows issues and write drivers for embedded products...and well, linux + glade + "language of choice" suits me better than say, Q

    • The whole point of Visual Basic is to enable those people you say "lost your job? Learn to code" to use something that is less daunting and more practical. It was designed to be a tool for someone who has a simple idea and wants to either automate their own business or sell something to a niche market and make a middle class living.

      Visual Basic was and is night and day better in many cases there than Node, Python, etc. You couldn't ask for something simpler than "draw the UI and start writing event handlers" for a basic, tiny app just getting started.

      If you are supplying it for external use/purchase, you should be able to hire someone to write it in a more production-ready language. If you are only using it for internal use... There isn't a very big space between Office macros, PowerShell, and moving up to C#. At least not now.

    • Re: (Score:1)

      by Anonymous Coward

      I use VB6 for all sorts of things. It doesn't have to be simple. It's no-work UI combined with the flexibility of COM and the Win32 API. And it runs without needing to install anything on virtually all current Windows machines.

      Compare that to the sluggish bloat and limited compatibility of a .Net runtime. Or the bloat and slowness of Java. I've never even had a Java runtime installed. It's fine for server-side or maybe phones, but for desktops/laptops, Win32 API is still the standard that everything else is

  • A stupid question (Score:3)

    by Hognoxious ( 631665 ) on Saturday December 08, 2018 @01:21PM (#57771554) Homepage Journal

    How the hell would any of us know? We're each aware of what we use, plus what's used by other people at our jobs, schools etc. It's a tiny subset of all developers.

    FWIW, I don't like either particularly.

  • Ugh (Score:3)

    by c ( 8461 ) <beauregardcp@gmail.com> on Saturday December 08, 2018 @01:23PM (#57771564)

    This is like asking if gonorrhea is a more popular STI than chlamydia.

  • And yet from actual code... (Score:3)

    by paulpach ( 798828 ) on Saturday December 08, 2018 @02:09PM (#57771754)

    This just show how poor TIOBE's methodology really is.

    Take a look at stats from actual pull request in github [github.com]
    The most popular languages are:

    1. Javascript
    2. Java
    3. Python
    4. PHP
    5. C++
    6. C#
    7. Typescript
    8. Shell
    9. C
    10. Ruby

    VB.Net is not even in the top 10

    Now, you can argue that these are mostly open source projects, and that proprietary code might be different. Fair enough, but I don't see how search results (TIOBE's method) reflect proprietary code any better than this.

    • This just show how poor TIOBE's methodology really is.

      Take a look at stats from actual pull request in github [github.com] The most popular languages are:

      1. Javascript 2. Java 3. Python 4. PHP 5. C++ 6. C# 7. Typescript 8. Shell 9. C 10. Ruby

      VB.Net is not even in the top 10

      Now, you can argue that these are mostly open source projects, and that proprietary code might be different. Fair enough, but I don't see how search results (TIOBE's method) reflect proprietary code any better than this.

      The VB.NET I was exposed to filled a roll that was so particular to the environment where it was created, nobody would ever want it on GitHub. It was hard enough to decipher in its native environment, it would be absolutely useless elsewhere. Move a file, query a database, rename the file, convert it to a weird text format, move it back, make a backup, and present a million pop up dialog boxes along the way.

    • My guess is that VB.NET gets a lot of search queries from people who aren't programmers but nevertheless are dabbling in it to try to get MS Office to do something it probably shouldn't really be doing anyway. So I'm sure it's a lot of "How to do X in VB.NET" search queries. Given that these people aren't programmers and that VB.NET isn't as simple as VB6*, I'm sure this means lots of searches.

      *This is because Microsoft actually fixed a lot of problems with VB with VB.NET, but one of the consequences is th

      • TIOBE doesn't count "search queries". Instead, it counts "number of pages". So, Google shows something like "Visual Studio basics" as an answer to "Visual Basic programming", and TIOBE counts that.

  • Probably a lot of older software getting a revamp or needs things changed now and some poor sod got the job "add X to our current system".
  • Another reason for a spike in VB.NET interest would be there was a big project to port something off it to another language.

  • Look VB.net is basically just C# with a syntax that seems a little less scary to beginners. In fact people have written scripts to convert VB.net to C# and back again. VB.net is no longer like the qbasic or gwbasic that came free with dos. VB.net isn't even like visual basic 6. Actually even vb 6 had its place as it was a language that let novices quickly put gui front ends on things. Remember that anyone can make both garbage and good code from just about any language. True some languages seem to make writ

  • Moving from VB.NET to C# is pretty easy. I made the switch ten years ago, but still do some VB.NET in maintenance mode. VB is OK, but there is almost no support any more (open source, tutorials, etc.) VB is not really easy to learn. Even VB script is not that easy. I would always recommend C# for people who want to live in the Microsoft environment. The tools are the best, and support is improving.

  • They've somehow got the word "Shit" confused with "Popular".

  • If I'm searching Google for:
    - Java Programming
    - Visual Basic Programming
    - JavaScript Programming

    What am I looking for? Clearly, I'm a student, or someone just curious about programming.

    If I'm a programmer, experienced in writing code, these are not things I would search for. Instead, I'm looking for:
    - Java Serialize JSON
    - C# REST API call
    - JavaScript Ajax Mathod

    The methodology of this "study" self-selects students, or curious people who don't know about programming. JavaScript is everywhere, like the air, b

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion

Slashdot Top Deals

"Mach was the greatest intellectual fraud in the last ten years." "What about X?" "I said `intellectual'." ;login, 9/1990

Close