cbowland writes: "Sharp is now shipping the SL-5000D Zaurus PDA with a Linux 2.4 kernel, embedded PalmTop, Personal Java, and QT. Priced at $399 for developers only. Their plan is to get some apps created before marketing it to the public. Check it out" I wonder if the USB port on the docking station would let these work with the Happy Hacker keyboard ...

Anonymous Coward writes "It seems that the folks over at O'Reilly have quietly released a book entitled, "Java Internationalization". The website for the book can be reached from the Java O'Reilly site, . The authors also have a website dedicated to the book. I'm curious as to how developers are treating software internationalization, not just in Java, but in other programming languages like C#, C++, Perl. For software designers out there today, is internationalization and localization a forethought or an afterthought? Is Java the only viable language for writing truly multi-lingual applications?"

peterdaly writes "The JBoss website has an interview with Marc Fleury, the JBoss founder regarding his vision. In case you have been living under a rock, JBoss is an Open Source Java Application Server (J2EE) which has been picking up tons of steam recently, especially with the recent introduction of features like clustering. Competing products from companies like IBM (WebSphere) and BEA (WebLogic) go for tens of thousands of dollars, which is interesting since JBoss is starting to have features the big boys don't. JBoss had 72,000 downloads in October. This is a project to watch."

Embedded Geek writes: "Embedded Systems Programming has a piece about Microsoft organizing its employees to advocate their embedded products in online newsgroups (part of "a new culture at Microsoft" making "an effort to shed the company's reputation as an incommunicative giant.") This is coordinated with Microsoft's launch of Windows XP Embedded at their Embedded Developers' Conference (the countdown clock on their homepage says Wednesday but the launch party is Thursday)." News.com notes that this will be used in slot machines and ATMs. Insert obligatory free-money joke.

webword writes: "Dr. Dobbs is running a story by Ron Minnich on implementing private namespaces for Linux to solve problems in both distributed and cluster computing. This topic hasn't received as much attention as it should. I'm glad that someone published something intelligent and worth reading."

Ian Bevan asks: "In my last job we were replacing a legacy system, written in COBOL and running on a Fujitsu mainframe since 1985 (it was a payroll application). A bespoke database application I wrote in 1989 was still being used, unmodified, last year. What's the oldest software you know of still in production? Anybody know of anything from the 70s, or even 60s ? What's it used for?" Has anyone seen software in production that is older than they are?

Narril Duskwalker writes "This one's from cNet.
`There's only one problem with software development these days, according to security analyst and author Gary McGraw: It isn't any good.'"

An Anonymous Coward writes: "This article is the third in LinuxDevices.com's new series of reviews, by software developer Jerry Epplin, of Embedded Linux toolkits. In order to gain insight into the use of each toolkit from the developer's perspective, Epplin builds Embedded Linux OS images for three different x86-based EBX form-factor single board computers using each toolkit. Each of the toolkits is then evaluated against a common set of criteria which include ease of use, overall toolkit architecture, methods of package management, diversity of platform support, and openness of the source code. In this installment, Epplin takes a close-up look at Red Hat's recently announced Embedded Linux Developer Suite."

woggo queries: "I'm a CS grad student working on a large research project (over 1 million lines of code, supported on many platforms). The project has been under development for several years, and the build system is nontrivial for end-users. We'd like to make it easier to build our software, and I'm investigating the feasibility of migrating to GNU autoconf. I need to demonstrate that the benefits of autoconf outweigh the costs of migrating a large system of makefiles with a lot of ad-hoc kludge-enabling logic. Has anyone made a similar case to their advisor/manager? Does anyone have some good 'autoconfiscation' war stories to share? (I've already seen the Berkeley amd story and the obvious links from a google search....)" Depending on the intricacies of the build process, such a conversion might take an awful lot of work. It might be easier to put a nicer face on the "nontrivial build process", although there is something to be said for the ease of "./configure; make; make install"

Denise writes: "'What happens if you get a bunch of academic computer scientists and implementors of languages such as Perl, Python, Smalltalk and Curl, and lock them into a room for a day? Bringing together the academic and commercial sides of language design and implementation was the interesting premise behind last weekend's Lightweight Languages Workshop, LL1, at the AI Lab at MIT.' Simon Cozens report, on perl.com, says it wasn't the flame fest you might have imagined."

Lisa writes: "Colliding billiard balls. Missile trajectories. Cornering dynamics in speeding cars. If these type of actions are expressed in computer software, applying physics-based models can greatly enhance the level of realism. David M. Bourg offers five steps towards doing just that in this LinuxDev Center article."

Sean-O writes " Shattering the myth of the faultless programmer, this article dismantles the uninspired software group and then builds it up again into a synchronized, nergized ensemble. It's full of tips to improve your Perl skills, ranging from best programming practices to code debugging."

Anml4ixoye asks: "I currently work for a county government as their senior webmaster. Before that, I oversaw the internet development for a large credit union. In both places I ran into the same issues. What should compose a web services team, and where does it belong within an organization? I notice that larger companies such as IBM have separate departments for their web sites (VP of Web Site Operations). So my question is, should the team that handles the organization's web site be its own entity, being solely responsible for the hardware, programming and implementation of the web site, or can those tasks be effectively split between several sections and still work? Can anyone give some insight into how it works within your organization?"

Snowfox asks: "At Midway Games, we're currently using Microsoft's SourceSafe. I'm evaluating other options, such as CVS. Currently, SourceSafe is used not only for source code, but art assets, project management documents and more. Has anyone made a move from SourceSafe to CVS? Can you comment on your experiences?"

rleyton writes: "javaworld has an article on Microsoft J#.net - offering developers a migration path to .net for their VJ++ projects. JDK 1.1.4, and Windows platform support only, of course..."

snotty6969 writes: "Freeze Update. Anthony Towns sent in an updated report about the Woody freeze process. We're almost into the last week for uploads of base packages. If there are outstanding bugs you'd like to see fixed, provide patches or upload now. We are also getting into the last days for ensuring that standard and task packages get included in the Woody release. At the moment it looks like a lot of packages will be removed from Woody. Among these are a whole bunch of commonly used programs like gpm, Mutt, CVS, Procmail, Apache and Mozilla. People who can fix bugs in these packages and care about them are encouraged to send in patches or upload fixed packages using Anthony's unofficial NMU guidelines."

An Anonymous Coward writes: "The IEEE has a project going to establish a Software Engineering Body of Knowledge. I'd recommend that all Slashdotters read this and send comments to this since this project could lead to the officially designating Software Engineers as a real Engineering discipline. That could then mean that licenses could be required to practice software development and that this could to regulation and other legal ramifications." On the surface this looks like a fairly boring document/process, but this is a major step forward - turning software engineering from an art into a science.

edrugtrader asks: "I am the sole developer for a corporate intranet site. New complex features are always being added, and old features are always being updated. The source code for the site is in very terse PHP, and sums up to about 2MB of code (i would guess around 30,000+ lines). Are there any standards or studies about how many developers it takes to maintain such a large and changing codebase? I am looking for something like, '40,000 lines = 2 full time developers', or '2MB of code = 3 full time developers'. I can currently handle everything fine, but I want to know at what point I should be looking for new hires. I have read studies that a developer writes 1 line of debugged code at the same rate no matter what the language is, so the fact that it is PHP should probably not come into play." As a metric, I think the number of lines per developers may not be perfect, but it is fairly intuitive. Has anyone actually looked into what this ratio is in their shop, particularly for large projects?

MAIC-32 writes: "OSNews features a very informative and detailed review of AtheOS, the promising 32-bit GPL Operating System. The article describes the installation process, the GUI (screenshots included), usage, internal design, developement and much more."

wbav queries: "I've been programming for a number of years, and someone always asks, 'What language do you use, Java or C++?'. Now personally, I find that question a little biased, mainly because, of how I program. Rather than making one massive program, adding in all the support I need to make up for weaknesses in languages, I prefer to make several different apps that call each other, each using the strengths of that particular language. I tend to use C++ as my controlling program, and then execute Perl, PHP, or Java depending on what will give me the best performance for and cause me the least amount of pain to accomplish the task at hand. Do you guys use this kind of method, or do you try to do everything in one program? What advantages or disadvantages do you see in creating one program compared to many programs?"